Table 2

Study characteristics and main results of included studies

Author, year of publicationStudy designLocation: medial/lateral, type of tearSample size: NAge: year mean±SD (range)Follow-up: year mean±SD (range)Female: N (%)Risk of bias (type of bias)Independent variablesOutcome measureMain conclusions (P value)
Aune et al, 199518 Prospective cohortMedial, all tear types93Median 45 (12–75)3.5, SD: NM (2.1–4.2)28 (30)High (Sel., Conf.)Chondral damageLysholmChondral damage: worse outcome (P<0.04)
Bin et al, 200428 Retrospective cohortMedial posterior horn, radial tears85 (96 knees)56, SD: NM (31–77)2.3, SD: NM (1–4.3)70 (73)High (Sel., Conf.)Tear depthLysholmNS (P>0.05)
Bin et al, 200849 Retrospective cohortMedial, all tears6863, SD: NM (51–77)4.3, SD: NM (3.1–6.9)63 (93)High (Sel., Conf.)Location of chondral damageLysholm, VASNS (P=0.16)
Bolano et al, 199336 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears5030, SD and range: NM5.6, SD and range: NM5 (10)Moderate (Conf.)Age, sex, duration of symptoms (</>12 months), tear location/type, chondral damageLysholm, TegnerHigher age, long duration of symptoms, horizontal/complex tear and chondral damage: worse outcome (P<0.05)
Sex, tear location: NS (P value NM)
Bonneux et al, 200242 Retrospective cohortLateral, all tears29 (31 knees)25, SD and range: NM8±1.5 (range NM)9 (36)High (Sel., Conf.)Sex, BMI, traumatic/non-traumatic, sport level, amount of resected tissue (subtotal/limited)IKDC, LysholmLarger amount of resected tissue (subtotal, >50%): worse outcome (P=0.02)
Sex, BMI, traumatic/non-traumatic, sport level: NS (P=0.3, 0.4, 0.2, 0.4 resp.)
Chatain et al, 200343 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears47137±12 (13-70)11±1.3 (10–15)99 (21)High (Sel., Conf.)Age, sex, BMI, sport level, leg alignment, tear location (medial/lateral), tear type, chondral damage, amount of resected tissue (rim involved yes or no)IKDCLarger amount of resected tissue (rim involved): worse outcome (P=0.004)
Age, sex, BMI, sport level, leg alignment, tear location, type, chondral damage: NS (P≥0.05)
Covall et al, 199238 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears46 (56 knees)57, SD: NM (45–72)5.4±1.3 (3–8)6 (11)High (Sel., Conf.)Leg alignment, radiological knee OAModified Lysholm, TegnerRadiological knee OA: worse outcome (P<0.05)
Valgus leg alignment: better outcome (P<0.001)
Erdil et al, 201323 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears109043, SD: NM (18–50)1, SD and range: NM423 (35)Moderate (Conf.)Sex, BMI, side of knee (left/right), tear typeIKDC, Lysholm, OxfordHigher BMI: worse outcome (P<0.001)
Sex, side of knee, tear type: NS (P=0.88 for sex, P value for the others NM
Fauno et al, 199348 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears8830, SD: NM (13–62)8.6 SD: NM (8–11.6)24 (27)Moderate (Conf.)Age, sex, sport level, sport type, tear type, chondral damageLysholmHigher age, ball sports, flap-tears: worse outcome (P=0.002, 0.0001, 0.004 resp.)
Sex, sport level, chondral damage: NS (P value NM)
Ghislain et al, 201647 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears11747±9 (18–72)4±0.3 (range NM)69 (59)High, (Sel., Conf.)Traumatic/non-traumaticLysholm, SF-36Non-traumatic: worse outcome (P<0.0001)
Han et al, 201039 Retrospective cohortMedial posterior horn, root tears4659, SD: NM (48–85)6.5, SD: NM (5–8.6)36 (78)High, (Sel., Conf.)Radiological knee OA, chondral damageLysholmRadiological knee OA, chondral damage: worse outcome (P=0.004, 0.002 resp.)
Haviv et al, 201533 Retrospective cohortMedial, complex tears13551, SD: NM (20–80)2, SD and range: NM49 (36)High, (Sel., Conf.)BMI, chondral damageLysholm, VASChondral damage: worse outcome in women (P=0.05)
Higher BMI: worse outcome in men (P=0.02)
Haviv et al, 201619 Prospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears20144±15 (range NM)1±0.3 (range NM)68 (34)High, (Sel., Conf.)Age, sex, chondral damageLysholm, TegnerOlder age, female, chondral damage: worse outcome (P<0.0001)
Haviv et al, 201674 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears8648±13 (range NM)1±0.3 (range NM)24 (28)High, (Sel., Conf.)Traumatic/non-traumaticLysholm, TegnerTraumatic/non-traumatic: NS (P=0.24)
Haviv et al, 201637 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears18746±15 (range NM)1±0.3 (range NM)51 (27)High, (Sel., Conf.)Duration of symptomsLysholmLonger duration of symptoms: worse outcome (P=0.01)
Hoser et al, 200146 Retrospective cohortLateral, all tears29 (31 knees)44±13 (range NM)10.3±0.6 (9.2–12.1)5 (17)High, (Sel., Conf.)Amount of resected tissueLysholmAmount of resected tissue: NS (P value NM)
Hulet et al, 200173 Retrospective cohortMedial, all tears57 (74 knees)36±11 (range NM)12±1 (range NM)11 (19)High, (Sel., Conf.)Age, sex, traumatic/non-traumatic, activity, tear type, chondral damageIKDCAge, sex, traumatic/non-traumatic, activity, tear type, chondral damage: NS (P value NM)
Hulet et al, 201545 Retrospective cohortLateral, all tears8935±13 (range NM)22±3 (range NM)33 (37)High, (Sel., Conf.)Sex, tear type, amount of resected tissueIKDC, KOOSLarger amount of resected tissue: worse outcome (P value NM)
Sex, tear type: NS (P value NM)
Jaureguito et al, 199522 Retrospective cohortLateral, all tears26 (27 knees)30, SD: NM (14–57)8, SD: NM (5.5–11.3)NMHigh, (Sel., Conf.)Age, leg alignment, tear typeLysholmLeg alignment, tear type, age: NS (P=0.83, 0.45, NM resp.)
Kim et al, 201330 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, horizontal tears4034, SD: NM (16–40)2, SD and range: NM24 (60)Moderate (Conf.)Traumatic/non-traumaticIKDC, LysholmTraumatic/non-traumatic: NS (P=0.41)
Kim et al, 201444 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears31241, SD: NM (13–62)5, SD and range: NM120 (38)High (Sel., Conf.)Amount of resected tissue (vertical resection/horizontal resection/subtotalIKDCLarger amount of resected tissue (subtotal): worse outcome (P<0.001)
Kim et al, 201631 Retrospective cohortMedial, horizontal tears98 (100 knees)40±8 (range NM)1.5±1.5 range NM)21 (21)High (Sel., Conf.)Tear type (direction)IKDC, TegnerTear type: NS (P value NM)
Maletius et al, 199635 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears4029, SD: NM (18–40)13, SD: NM (12–15)8 (20)LowAge, chondral damageLysholm, TegnerHigher age: worse outcome (P=0.03)
Chondral damage: NS (P value NM)
Menetrey et al, 200227 Retrospective cohortMedial, all tears3260, SD: NM (51–74)6, SD: NM (3–7)11 (34)High (Sel., Conf.)Traumatic/non-traumaticHSS Knee ScoreNon-traumatic: worse outcome (P=0.009)
Ozkoc et al, 200829 Retrospective cohortMedial, radial root tears6756, SD: NM (38–70)4.8, SD and range: NM47 (70)High (Sel., Conf.)BMILysholmBMI: NS (P>0.01)
Rockborn et al, 199525 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears4319, SD: NM (15–22)13, SD: NM (11–15)6 (14)Moderate (Conf.)Amount of resected tissue (partial/subtotal)Lysholm, TegnerLarger amount of resected tissue (subtotal): worse outcome (P=0.02)
Rosenberger et al, 201020 Prospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears18048, SD: NM (17–78)1, SD and range: NM79 (44)High (Sel., Conf.)Age, sex, BMI, activity, fitness, prior injury, chondral damageLysholm, TegnerFemale, lower fitness, prior injury, chondral damage: worse outcome (P=0.0001, 0.033, 0.002, 0.028 resp.)
Age, BMI, activity: NS (P=0.32, 0.20, 0.42 resp.)
Scanzello et al, 201321 Prospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears33Median 45 (IQR 40–53)2, SD and range: NM12 (36)High (Sel., Conf.)Synovial inflammationLysholmSynovial inflammation: NS (P=0.14)
Scheller et al, 200172 Retrospective cohortLateral, all tears7541, SD and range: NM9.5, SD: NM (5–15)32 (42)High, (Sel., Conf.)Age, BMI, traumatic/non-traumatic, tear typeLysholmHigher age and higher BMI: worse outcome (P value NM)
Traumatic/non-traumatic, tear type: NS (P value NM)
Shelbourne et al, 200634 Retrospective cohortMedial, bucket-handle tears7929±11 (13–57)11.8±6.9 (3–22)4 (5)High (Sel., Conf.)AgeIKDCAge: NS (R2=−0.33)
Sihvonen et al 20136 Prospective randomised controlled trialMedial, all tears14652±7 (range NM)157 (39)LowTraumatic/non-traumaticLysholm, WOMETTraumatic/non-traumatic: NS (P value NM)
Yilar et al, 201424 Retrospective cohortMedial and lateral, all tears9058±9 (38–82)12, SD and range: NM64 (71)High, (Sel., Conf.)Age, sex, BMI (BMI <25/25–29/>29)Lysholm, WOMACHigher BMI (>29): worse outcome (P<0.0001)
Age, sex: NS (P value NM)
  • NS, no statistically significant difference found; NM, not mentioned; Sel., selection bias; Conf., confounding; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; KOOS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; VAS, Visual Analogue Scale; HSS Knee Score, Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score; SF-36, Short Form health survey; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; WOMET, Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool.