Table 1

Included studies involving asymptomatic participants only

AuthorStudy designStudy populationParticipants (hips, n)DemographicsImaging modalityFindings (intra-articular pathology)
Ayeni et al 40 Cross-sectional Subjects
Ice hockey players
Controls
Non-athletic individuals
Subjects
20 (20)
Controls
20 (20)
Subjects
Age*: 20.6
Sex: 9 F/11 M
Controls
Age*: 20.1
Sex: 9 F/11 M
1.5 T MRI Subjects
Labral tear: 12/20; acetabular cartilage defect: 0/20; femoral cartilage defect: 2/20; herniation pit: 2/20; osseous bump: 4/20; paralabral cyst: 0/20
Controls
Labral tear: 12/20; acetabular cartilage defect: 3/20; femoral cartilage defect: 3/20; herniation pit: 2/20; osseous bump: 4/20; paralabral cyst: 0/20
Farrell et al 59 Cross-sectional Subjects
Rugby union academy players
Controls
Moderately active individuals
Subjects
20 (40)
Controls
No MRI performed
Subjects
Age*: 22 (1.5)
Sex: 20 M
Controls
Age*: 21.3 (1.7)
Sex: 20 M
3 T MRI Subjects
Labral tear: 17/20‡; labral tear right hip: 10/20; labral tear left hip: 15/20; bilateral labral tear: 8/20; cartilage defect: 5/20; cartilage defect right hip: 3/20; cartilage defect left hip: 3/20; bilateral cartilage defect: 1/20
Georgiadis et al 60 Case seriesChildren108 (216)Age*: 11.9 (†2–18)3 T MRI
1.5 T MRI
Labral tear per person: 2/108; labral tear per hip: 3/216
Lahner et al 42 Cross-sectional Subjects
Semiprofessional soccer players
Controls
Amateur soccer players
Subjects
22 (22)
Controls
22 (22)
Subjects
Age*: 23.3 (3.3)
Sex: 22 M
Controls
Age*: 22.5 (3.5)
Sex: 22 M
1.5 T MRI Subjects
Labral tear: 3/22; cartilage defect: 2/22
Controls
Labral tear: 1/22; cartilage defect: 1/22
Lahner et al 57 Cross-sectional Subjects
Track and field athletes
Controls
Non-athletes
Subjects
22 (44)
Controls
22 (44)
Subjects
Age*: 23.7 (3.0) (†18–30)
Sex: 11 F/11 M
Controls
Age*: 22.4 (4.2) (†18–32)
Sex: 11 F/11 M
1.5 T MRI Subjects
Labral tear: 2/44; acetabular cartilage defect: 1/44; femoral cartilage defect: 1/44; herniation pit: 3/44; osseous bump: 3/44
Controls
Labral tear: 1/44; acetabular cartilage defect: 0/44; femoral cartilage defect: 0/44; herniation pit: 1/44; osseous bump: 0/44
Lee et al 64 Cross-sectionalMedical students and allied health professionals70 (70)Age*: 26 (†19–41)
Sex: 47 F/23 M
3 T MRILabral tear: 27/70; isolated labral tear: 16/70; sublabral recesses: 10/70; labral ossification: 10/70; paralabral cyst: 1/70; acetabular cartilage delamination 7/70; fibrocystic changes at head-neck junction 4/70; intra-articular pathology with or without labral tear: 32/70
Leunig et al 52 Cross-sectional Subjects
Young women
Controls
Young men
Subjects
80 (80)
Controls
244 (244)
Subjects
Age*: 19.3±1.3
Controls
Age*: 20.0±0.9
1.5 T MRI Subjects
Labral tear: 17/80; intra-labral signal alterations: 10/80; labral avulsions: 13/80; labral deformities: 4/80; labral ganglions: 4/80; impingement pits: 0/80
Controls
Labral tear: 175/244; intra-labral signal alterations: 86/244; labral avulsions: 153/244; labral deformities: 27/244; labral ganglions: 65/244; impingement pits: 41/244
Mineta et al 62 Case seriesIndividuals who underwent abdominal or pelvic CTNR (1178)Age*: 58.2 (†20–89)
Sex: 483 F/695 M
CTHerniation pit: 164/1178
Panzer et al 46 Case seriesIndividuals who had CT for polytrauma/pelvic, abdominal or thoracic examinations200 (400)Age*: 55.1 (†15–96)
Sex: 77 F/123 M
CTHerniation pit (per person): 85/200; herniation pit (per hip): 107/400; >1 herniation pit (per hip): 25/400; herniation pit right hip: 65/107; herniation pit left hip: 42/107; bilateral herniation pit: 22/85
Philippon et al 53 Cross-sectional Subjects
Youth ice hockey players
Controls
Youth skiers
Subjects
61 (61)
Controls
27 (27)
Subjects
Age*: 14.5 (2.7)
Sex: 61 M
Controls
Age*: 15.2 (2.7)
Sex: 27 M
3 T MRI Subjects
Labral tear: 42/61; peewee hockey players—labral tear: 13/27; bantam hockey players—labral tear: 5/8; midget hockey players—labral tear: 24/26; cartilage defect: 5/61; peewee hockey players—cartilage defect: 0/27; bantam hockey players—cartilage defect: 0/8; midget hockey players—cartilage defect: 5/26
Controls
Labral tear: 19/27; skier—labral tear (peewee control): 5/7; skier—labral tear (bantam control): 5/8; skier—labral tear (midget control): 9/12; cartilage defect: 1/27; skier—cartilage defect (peewee control): 0/7; skier—cartilage defect (bantam control): 0/8; skier—cartilage defect (midget control): 1/12
Register et al 49 Cross-sectionalAsymptomatic individuals45 (45)Age*: 38 (†18–66)
Sex: 17 F/28 M
3 T MRILabral tears: 31/45; cartilage defect: 11/45; ligamentum teres tear: 1/45; labral/paralabral cyst: 6/45; acetabular bone oedema: 5/45; fibrocystic changes to the femoral head/neck junction: 10/45; rim fracture: 5/45; subchondral cysts: 7/45; osseous bump of the femoral neck: 9/45
Schmitz et al 50 Case seriesUS air force personnel on active duty21 (42)Age*: 34 (†27–43)
Sex: 5 F/16 M
1.5 T MRILabral tears: reader 1 35/42; reader 2 33/42
Paralabral cysts: reader 1 11/42; reader 2 9/42
Silvis et al 48 Cross-sectionalIce hockey players39 (39)Age: NR
Sex: 39 M
3 T MRIHip pathology total findings: 25/39; labral tear: 22/39; cartilage defect: 7/39; hip effusion: 0/39
Yuan et al 54 Cross-sectional Subjects
High school student with clinical signs of FAI
Controls
High school students no clinical signs of FAI
Subjects
13 (22)
Controls
13 (26)
Subjects
Age: NR
Sex: 1 F/12 M
Controls
Age: NR
Sex: 1 F/12 M
3 T MRI
1.5 T MRI
Subjects
Any abnormal hip finding: 15/22; labral tear: 14/22; acetabular rim damage: 3/22; cartilage defect: 1/22
Controls
Any abnormal hip finding: 10/26; labral tear: 10/26; acetabular rim damage: 0/26; cartilage defect: 1/26
  • *Mean (SD).

  • †Range.

  • ‡Results from raw data obtained from author.

  • F, female; FAI, femoroacetabular impingement; M, male; NR, not reported.