Table 2

Baseline patient characteristics and MRI findings

All participants
(n=165)
Qatar cohort
(n=90)
Dutch cohort
(n=75)
Age (years)(IQR:22 – 31)(IQR:22 – 30)(IQR:22 – 33)
Sport
 Football119 (72%)66 (73%)53 (71%)
 Hockey14 (9%)2 (2%)12 (16%)
 Futsal9 (6%)8 (9%)1 (1%)
 Athletics5 (3%)4 (4%)1 (1%)
 Other18 (11%)10 (11%)8 (11%)
Level of participation
 Professional87 (53%)87 (97%)0 (0%)
 Competitive58 (35%)3 (3%)55 (73%)
 Recreational20 (12%)0 (0%)20 (27%)
Previous (ipsilateral) hamstring injury
in the last 12  months
 Yes37 (22%)11 (12%)26 (35%)
 No128 (78%)79 (88%)49 (65%)
MRI grade
 Grade 168 (41%)47 (52%)21 (28%)
 Grade 297 (59%)43 (48%)54 (72%)
Muscle injured
 Biceps femoris135 (82%)69 (77%)66 (88%)
 Semitendinosus7 (4%)3 (3%)4 (5%)
 Semimembranosus23 (14%)18 (20%)5 (7%)
Oedema dimensions
 Craniocaudal length (cm)13.7±6.815.3±6.911.7±6.1
 CSA (% of muscle CSA)23.1 (IQR:
9.9–48.2)
16.8 (IQR:
8.0–46.4)
30.5 (IQR:
15.5–49.3)
Intramuscular tendon injury
 No tendon disruption96 (58%)53 (59%)43 (57%)
 Free tendon disruption5 (3%)5 (6%)0 (0%)
 Intramuscular tendon disruption64 (39%)32 (36%)32 (43%)
  <50% of tendon CSA12 (7%) 5 (6%)7 (9%)
  50%–99% of tendon CSA28 (17%)14 (16%)14 (19%)
  100% of tendon CSA24 (15%)13 (14%)11 (15%)
  Biceps femoris48 (75%)19 (59%)29 (91%)
  Biceps femoris and semitendinosus8 (13%)8 (25%)0 (0%)
  Semitendinosus0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
  Semimembranosus8 (13%)5 (16%)3 (9%)
 Longitudinal tendon disruption
  Length of intramuscular tendon disruption (cm)6.2±2.86.8±2.25.7±3.2
  Retraction (cm)3.7 (IQR:
2.0–5.9)
3.3 (IQR:
1.5–6.7)
3.7 (IQR:
2.1–5.9)
 Waviness
  Present37 (22%)19 (21%)18 (24%)
  Absent128 (78%)71 (79%)57 (76%)
  • Normally distributed data are presented as a mean with SD and non-normally distributed data as a median with IQR.

  • CSA, cross-sectional area.