Studies reporting, n (%) | ICF domain | |
Patient-report | 26 (12 of 209) | |
Patient-reported outcome measures | 8 (31 of 26) | Contextual |
IKDC | 5 (63 of 8) | |
Within 15% of gender aged-matched controls | 3 (38) | |
Composite score of 90% | 1 (13) | |
Question #10: ≥9 points | 1 (13) | |
KOS-ADL: score ≥90% | 3 (38) | |
ACL-RSI: score ≥56% | 1 (13) | |
Global rating of knee function: score ≥90% | 1 (13) | |
Subjective statements | 9 (35 of 26) | |
‘Full subjective functional stability’ | 4 (44 of 9) | |
When athlete felt comfortable | 2 (22) | |
Full subjective confidence in knee | 2 (22) | |
‘Desire to return to previous activity’ | 1 (11) | |
Pain | 11 (42 of 26) | |
‘No pain’ | 7 (64 of 11) | |
‘No problematic symptoms’ | 3 (27) | |
‘<3/10 pain’ | 1 (9) | |
Clinical examination | 54 (26 of 209) | Impairments |
Ligament stability | 35 (65 of 54) | |
KT-1000 | 8 (23 of 35) | |
Lachman test | 6 (17) | |
Pivot shift | 3 (9) | |
Anterior drawer | 1 (3) | |
Stability testing method not stated | 22 (63) | |
Range of motion (ROM) | 30 (56 of 54) | |
Full/complete ROM | 25 (83 of 30) | |
Less than full ROM | 2 (7) | |
ROM equal to contralateral leg | 2 (7) | |
Adequate ROM | 1 (3) | |
Effusion | 20 (37 of 54) | |
No effusion | 18 (90 of 20) | |
Minimal effusion | 2 (10) | |
Thigh circumference | 3 (6 of 54) | |
Atrophy ≤1 cm | 2 (67 of 3) | |
≤2 cm difference in thigh circumference | 1 (33) | |
‘Satisfactory clinical exam’ | 2 (4 of 54) | |
Performance-based criteria | 41 (20 of 209) | |
Agility | 4 (10 of 41) | Activities |
T-test | 2 (50 of 4) | |
‘Good agility’ | 2 (50) | |
Proprioception | 6 (15 of 41) | Impairments |
Equal to contralateral | 2 (33 of 6) | |
Y-balance test within 80% uninvolved | 1 (17) | |
Star excursion balance test symmetry | 1 (17) | |
Demonstrated balance/coordination | 1 (17) | |
Prek Kinesthetic Action Training System 100% | 1 (17) | |
Aerobic endurance | 2 (5 of 41) | Activities |
Lactate aerobic–anaerobic threshold test | 1 (50 of 2) | |
Treadmill run for 10 min at 8 km/hour | 1 (50) | |
Quality of motion | 3 (7 of 41) | Impairments |
Landing Error Scoring System <5 | 2 (67 of 3) | |
Limb alignment control following fatiguing task: single-leg land (QASLS score 0–1) | 1 (33) | |
Completion of a specific programme | 27 (66 of 41) | |
Running programme | 6 (22 of 27) | Activities |
On-field/sport-specific/functional programme | 9 (33) | Participation |
Rehabilitation programme | 7 (26) | Activities |
Agility programme | 4 (15) | Activities |
Proprioceptive programme | 1 (4) | Activities |
Non-specific performance-based criteria | 6 (15 of 41) | Activities |
Rehabilitation goals met | 2 (33 of 6) | |
Regained agility, strength and coordination | 1 (17) | |
Full functional stability in terms of strength, coordination and balance | 1 (17) | |
Able to perform sport-related movements safely per physical therapist and surgeon | 1 (17) | |
No functional complaints, confidence when running cutting and jumping at full speed | 1 (17) |
References in online appendix III.
ACL-RSI, ACL – Return to Sport After Injury; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; KOS-ADL, Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living; QASLS, single-leg loading qualitative assessment tool.