Table 1

Tasks regarded as constituting ‘hard’ occupational work, percentage of workers involved in the ‘active’ category and adjusted risk ratios for premature death

AuthorsNature of ‘heavy’ task% Active, adjusted risk ratio (active/sedentary)
Menotti et al 3 (2016)Average daily energy expenditure 12.9 MJ (estimated from the questionnaire, ergometric data and diet)68.2% of sample active
0.76 (0.64 to 0.90)
Turi et al (2017)Translation of Baecke questionnaire; top two ‘sufficiently active’ segments of occupational30.0% of sample active
0.45 (0.20 to 0.97)a
0.78 (0.07–9.41)
Etemadi et al (2014)Questionnaire, activities causing significant increases of heart rate and sweating (often outdoors, eg, farming)10.7% of the sample active at cohort baseline
0.89 (0.84 to 0.95)b
0.84 (0.68 to 1.04)
Huerta et al (2016)EPIC questionnaire, summer and winter, ranking of job (sedentary/non-sedentary)69% of those working 0.99 (0.77 to 1.27)
Wanner et al (2014)Self-reported intensity (high/low)18.7% of sample
1.01 (0.88 to 1.15) c
1.01 (0.88 to 1.17)
Andersen et al (2000)Sitting or housekeeper without children vs other levels of activity% Not stated
0.86 (0.74 to 0.99)d
1.02 (0.83 to 1.26)
Petersen et al 6 (2012)Reports of lifting or carrying >10 kg; sedentary vs standing, walking or strenuous activity39.8% Lifting
38.9% Not sitting
Lifting 1.00 (ns) heavy work 1.02 (ns)
Clays (2014)Blue collar, white collar and executive; questionnaire estimated kJ/h, low vs moderate or highModerate 33.5%, high 34.1%
1.31 (ns), 1.21 (ns)
Holterman (2012)Quartiles based on questions on sitting, increased breathing, kneeling or squatting, and carrying >20 kgQuartile 3 25%
Quartile 4 25%
1.79 (1.19 to 2.70)e
1.22 (1.05 to 1.41)
Krause et al 7 (2017)Occupational interview re; sitting, standing, walking, stairs and other activities converted to kJ/dayHR per 2 MJ/day occ. energy expenditure
HD 1.16 (0.80 to 1.66) f
1.25 (0.72 to 2.19) no HD
1.30 (1.07 to 1.57)
Richard et al (2015)High vs low occupational categories32.4% of sample
1.25 (0.85 to 1.84) g
1.31 (0.90 to 1.91)
Holtermann et al (2010)Questions re: sitting, walking, lifting, stairs, strenuous work (eg, digging and shovelling), 3-level groupingHigh/heavy 18.1%
Medium 55.9%
1.17 (1.06 to 1.29),
1.33 (1.18 to 1.51) h
Chau et al (2015)Questions re: sitting, walking, lifting, heavy labour?
1.91 (0.98 to 3.73)
Harari et al (2015)Questions re: sitting, standing, walking, climbingModerate and hard 61.2%
1.42 (1.16 to 1.74)
Holtermann et al (2012)Questions re: sitting, walking, lifting, stairs, strenuous work (eg, digging and shovelling), 3-level groupingModerate 19.9%, hard 6.1%
1.15 (1.01 to 1.33)
1.22 (1.05 to 1.41) j
1.59 (1.16 to 2.31)
Stender et al (1993)Personal report of moderate or heavy work?
1.91 (0.98 to 3.73)
Hu et al (2014)Baecke questionnaire (sitting, standing, walking, lifting, sweating)33%, 33%
med 1.34 (0.90 to 1.99)
high 1.53 (1.06 to 2.22) k
3.40 (1.94 to 5.96)
  • Values reported by the original authors (bold type), and (where apparently different) the HRs used in the meta-analysis (light type). For details of references, see the online  supplementry table S2.

  • Location of risk ratios cited for individual studies: aTable 3, Cox regression; bTable 4, per one-level increase of work activity at baseline, ctext, p. 91, dtext, p. 1625, etext, p.305, ftext, p.983, gtext p. 184, hTable 4, iTable 2, jTable 3, kTable 4, lTable 3.