Table 1

Within-subject statistical models fitted to untransformed acute and chronic load data over 38 in-season weeks

ModelAICΔAICInference
Straight line, no intercept, with lognormal heteroscedastic error13,919.56352.96No empirical support
Three-parameter power function with lognormal, heteroscedastic error13,825.72259.12No empirical support
Straight line, intercept, with lognormal heteroscedastic error13,823.78257.18No empirical support
Two-parameter power function with lognormal, heteroscedastic error13,823.74257.14No empirical support
Straight line, no intercept, with normal heteroscedastic error13,702.02135.42No empirical support
Straight line, no intercept, with normal homoscedastic error13,696.38129.78No empirical support
Three-parameter power function with normal, heteroscedastic error13,610.8644.26No empirical support
Three-parameter power function with normal, homoscedastic error13,604.7238.12No empirical support
Straight line, intercept, with normal, heteroscedastic error13,568.301.70Essentially equivalent
Straight line, intercept, with normal, homoscedastic error13,567.621.02Essentially equivalent
Two-parameter power function with normal, homoscedastic error13,567.601.00Essentially equivalent
Two-parameter power function with normal, heteroscedastic error13,566.600Best
  • Qualitative terms for the relative difference (ΔAIC) from the estimated best model (ie, the model with the lowest AIC value; ΔAIC=0) were assigned according to the following scale: 0–2, essentially equivalent; 2–7, plausible alternative; 7–14, weak support; >14, no empirical support.10

  • AIC, Akaike’s information criterion; Δ AIC, Akaike difference.