Table 2

Rescoring of the articles from the review of Thorborg et al13

Studies
(authors, year)
QuestionnairesStructural validityInternal consistencyCross-cultural validityReliabilityMeasurement errorConstruct validityResponsiveness
Papers selected from the review of Thorborg et al13
Griffin et al, 201260iHOT-12InadequateDoubtfulDoubtfulVery good
Jónasson et al, 201438iHOT-12AdequateInadequateAdequateAdequateAdequateVery goodVery good
Mohtadi et al, 201261iHOT-33InadequateInadequateAdequateAdequateAdequate
Polesello et al, 201262iHOT-33Inadequate
Kemp et al, 201363iHOT-33, HOS, HAGOSDoubtfulAdequateAdequateVery goodVery good
Hinman et al, 201435iHOT-33, HOS, HAGOSInadequateAdequateAdequate
Martin et al, 200664HOSInadequateVery goodAdequate
Martin et al, 2007HOSAdequate
Martin et al, 200865HOSAdequateAdequateAdequate
Naal et al, 201166HOSVery goodInadequateAdequateAdequateVery good
Lee et al, 201539HOSVery goodAdequateDoubtfulVery goodInadequate
Polat et al, 201740HOSVery goodAdequateAdequateAdequateAdequateAdequate
Seijas et al, 201442HOSVery goodAdequateAdequateAdequateVery goodVery good
Thorborg et al, 201113HAGOSInadequateVery goodVery goodVery goodVery goodVery good
Kemp et al63, 2013HAGOSVery goodAdequateAdequateAdequateVery goodVery good
Thomeé et al, 201444HAGOSInadequateVery goodVery goodAdequateAdequateVery goodVery good
  • HAGOS, Hip and Groin Outcome Score; HOS, Hip Outcome Score; iHOT, International Hip Outcome Tool.