Table 2

Study characteristics and risk of bias assessment

Comparator group:(1) Non-surgical(2) Pharmacological(3) Surgical
Herrlin et al 51 66 Katz et al 54 72 73 Østerås et al 74 75 Yim et al 53 Gauffin et al 42 76 Kise et al 43 van de Graaf et al 45 Vermesan et al 55 Sihvonen et al 36 62 71 77 78 Roos et al 44
Comparator (control)PhysiotherapyPhysiotherapyPhysiotherapyPhysiotherapyPhysiotherapyPhysiotherapyPhysiotherapySteroid injectionPlacebo APMSham APM
Sample (randomised)9935117108150*140*321*11414644*
Sample (analysed)9032017102130*129*289*9814642*
Lost to follow-up, n (%)9 (9.1)31 (8.8)0 (0)6 (5.6)20 (13.3)11 (7.9)13 (4.0)16 (14.0)0 (0)2 (4.5)
Number of centresSingleMultipleMultipleSingleSingleMultipleMultipleSingleMultipleMultiple
Age mean (SD) (controls)55 (5.5)58 (6.8)47 (10.4)58 (11)54 (6)50 (6.2)57.3 (6.8)58 (7.8)52 (7)46 (5.7)
Female, % (controls)37571177253950463861
Minimum symptom duration2 months4 weeks3 months6 weeks3 months2 monthsNRNR3 months2 months
Osteoarthritis gradeAhlbäck 0–1K-L 0–3K-L 0–2K-L 0–1K-L 0–2*K-L 0–3*K-L 0–2*NRK-L 0–1K-L 0–2*
InterventionAPMAPMAPMAPMAPMAPMAPMAPMAPMAPM
Outcome measures (PROMs)KOOS.
Lysholm.
VAS Pain.
Tegner.
WOMAC (physical).
SF-36 (physical).
KOOS Pain.
KOOS
VAS Pain
Lysholm.
VAS Pain.
KOOS.
EQ-5D.
KOOS-4.
SF-36 (physical).
SF-36 (mental).
IKDC.
VAS Pain.
SF-36 (physical).
EQ-5D (NR).
Tegner.
OKS.Lysholm.
WOMET.
15D.
VAS Pain.
KOOS.
EQ-5D.
SF-36 (physical).
SF-36 (mental).
Endpoints (months)6, 24, 606, 1233, 6, 12, 2412, 363, 12, 243, 6, 12, 241, 126, 12, 243, 24
Cross-over †, %28.230.2NR1.921.318.629.020.86.636.0
Risk of bias (Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool)38
 Random sequence generation (selection bias)UnclearLowUnclearUnclearUnclearLowLowUnclearLowLow
 Allocation concealment (selection bias)UnclearLowUnclearUnclearLowLowUnclearUnclearLowLow
 Blinding of participants and researchers (performance bias)HighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighLowLow
 Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)HighHighHighHighHighHighHighHighLowLow
 Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)UnclearLowLowLowHighLowLowHighLowLow
 Selective reporting (reporting bias)UnclearHighUnclearUnclearUnclearHighUnclearUnclearLowLow
 Other bias (cross-over,† baseline imbalance)HighHighUnclearLowHighHighHighHighLowHigh
  • Risk of bias assessment (Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool).38

  • Further details including a full description of the intervention and comparator treatments, funding and location may be found in online supplementary appendix 4.

  • *Previously unpublished subgroup data (K-L 0–1) received.

  • †Underwent APM intervention after randomisation to control treatment.

  • APM, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy; EQ-5D, EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; K-L, Kellgren Lawrence grade; KOOS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; NR, not reported; OKS, Oxford Knee Score; PROMs, patient-reported outcome measures; SF-36,  36  -Item Short Form Health Survey; VAS, visual analogue pain score; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index;  WOMET, Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool; .