Study | Outcome measure | Downs and black Quality checklist | Cochrane RoB2 tool | |
Summary score | Quality category | Overall risk of bias judgement | ||
Wright et al, 201721 | FAAM-ADL FAAM-Sport CAIT (ADL) | 22 | High quality | High risk |
Donovan et al, 201623 | FAAM-ADL FAAM-Sport | 22 | High quality | High risk |
McKeon and Wikstrom, 201630 | FAAM-ADL FAAM-Sport | 23 | High quality | High risk |
Cruz-Diaz et al, 201524 | CAIT (ADL) | 21 | High quality | High risk |
Cruz-Diaz et al, 201525 | CAIT (ADL) | 21 | High quality | High risk |
Lubbe et al, 201527 | FADI-ADL | 23 | High quality | High risk |
Salom-Moreno et al, 201528 | FAAM-ADL FAAM-Sport | 22 | High quality | High risk |
Collins et al, 201426 | FAAM-ADL FAAM-Sport | 11 | Moderate quality | High risk |
Beazell et al, 201222 | FAAM-Sport | 24 | High quality | High risk |
Schaefer and Sandrey29 | FAAM-ADL FAAM-Sport | 20 | Moderate quality | High risk |
McKeon et al, 200831 | FADI-ADL FADI-Sport | 17 | Moderate quality | High risk |
Overall body of evidence | Patient-reported function |
Mean=21
Min–max=11–24 | High quality | High risk |
Cut-off scores to differentiate quality categories: low quality=1–10; moderate quality=11–20; high quality=21–31.
CAIT, Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool; FAAM-ADL, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Activities of Daily Living Subscale; FAAM-Sport, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Sports Subscale.