Table 2

Rescoring of the articles from the review of Thorborg et al 13

Studies
(authors, year)		QuestionnairesStructural validityInternal consistencyCross-cultural validityReliabilityMeasurement errorConstruct validityResponsiveness
Papers selected from the review of Thorborg et al 13
Griffin et al, 201260 iHOT-12Inadequate  Doubtful DoubtfulVery good
Jónasson et al, 201438 iHOT-12AdequateInadequateAdequateAdequateAdequateVery goodVery good
Mohtadi et al, 201261 iHOT-33InadequateInadequate Adequate AdequateAdequate
Polesello et al, 201262 iHOT-33  Inadequate    
Kemp et al, 201363 iHOT-33, HOS, HAGOS Doubtful AdequateAdequateVery goodVery good
Hinman et al, 201435 iHOT-33, HOS, HAGOS  InadequateAdequateAdequate  
Martin et al, 200664 HOSInadequateVery good   Adequate 
Martin et al, 2007HOS     Adequate 
Martin et al, 200865 HOS   AdequateAdequate Adequate
Naal et al, 201166 HOS Very goodInadequateAdequateAdequateVery good 
Lee et al, 201539 HOS Very goodAdequateDoubtful Very goodInadequate
Polat et al, 201740 HOS Very goodAdequateAdequateAdequateAdequateAdequate
Seijas et al, 201442 HOS Very goodAdequateAdequateAdequateVery goodVery good
Thorborg et al, 201113 HAGOSInadequateVery good Very goodVery goodVery goodVery good
Kemp et al 63, 2013HAGOS Very goodAdequateAdequateAdequateVery goodVery good
Thomeé et al, 201444 HAGOSInadequateVery goodVery goodAdequateAdequateVery goodVery good

  • HAGOS, Hip and Groin Outcome Score; HOS, Hip Outcome Score; iHOT, International Hip Outcome Tool.