B. Non-Randomised controlled trials
CategoryNumber of studiesTotal participants
(intervention group)
Actual (A) or simulated (S) travelAthlete specificMethodological qualityConsistencyDirectnessPrecisionPublication biasTotal
GRADE rating
Melatonin 2 34 (34)PoorVery low
+
Cardinali, et al 30
Manfredini, et al 39
22 (22)
12 (12)
A
A
Yes
Yes
10/28
9/28
Both studies no control group, clinical heterogeneity, methodological heterogeneity(The evidence answers the review question)Effect size andCIs not reported, no control group
Sedatives 1 17 (9)Poor
Reilly, et al 40 17 (9)AMixed
(gymnasts and support staff in one group)
9/28Mixed gymnasts and support staff into one group(The evidence answers the review question)Mixed athletes and non-athletesVery low
+
Stimulants 0
Melatonin analogues 1 8 (8)Moderate*/†*Low
++
Nickelsen, et al 45 SNo19/28Although small sample size, well described methodology and reported results(The evidence answers the review question)Effect size andCIs not reported
Glucocorticoids 0
Antihistamines 0
TOTAL 4 59 (51)
  • *.Some problems

  • †No serious problems.

  • ‡Major problems

  • §All athlete specific studies have small sample sizes that may lead to publication bias.

  • GRADE, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation; RCTs, randomised controlled trials; RoB, risk of bias.