Table 2

Group differences by study characteristics and methods

Grouping variableMedian effect size d (k)Quartile% of effects favouring dog-walking intervention
Total0.28 (k=9)0.029 of 11 studies (82%)
Design
 Experimental design0.28 (k=7)0.056 of 7 studies (86%)
 Quasi-experimental0.43 (k=2)0.163 of 4 studies (75%)
Control group
 Active0.06 (k=2)0.162 of 3 studies (67%)
 Passive0.30 (k=7)0.036 of 7 studies (86%)
Theoretical frame
 Stated theory0.31 (k=6)0.036 of 7 studies (86%)
 No theory0.10 (k=3)0.163 of 4 studies (75%)
BCTs
 >4 BCTs0.28 (k=7)0.056 of 7 studies (86%)
 <5 BCTs0.43 (k=2)0.163 of 4 studies (75%)
Follow-up (months)
 >5 0.02 (k=4)0.133 of 5 studies (60%)
 <5 0.50 (k=5)0.226 of 6 studies (100%)
Sample
 Clinical population0.34 (k=3)0.162 of 3 studies (67%)
 General population0.19 (k=6)0.037 of 8 studies (88%)
Sample size
 <700.06 (k=2)0.162 of 3 studies (67%)
 >690.34 (k=7)0.057 of 8 studies (88%)
Setting
 Supervised0.68 (k=2)0.342 of 2 studies (100%)
 Community0.10 (k=7)0.027 of 9 studies (77%)
Dissemination
 Face-to-face0.42 (k=6)0.046 of 7 studies (86%)
 Distance0.05 (k=3)0.023 of 4 studies (75%)
  • BCT, behaviour change technique.