Table 3

Determinants associated with suicidal ideation among athletes (n=192) having participated in the Swedish Athletics team 2011–17 (ORs (95% CI) established by binary logistic regression analyses)

Male athletes (n=86)Female athletes (n=106)All athletes (n=192)
Simple modelsMultiple model
Nagelkerke R 2=0.25
Simple modelsMultiple model
Nagelkerke R 2=0.33
Simple modelsMultiple model
Nagelkerke R 2=0.25
Personal characteristics
Financially disadvantaged childhoodn.s.5.40 (1.59 to 18.4) (p=0.007)2.46 (1.01 to 6.02) (p=0.048)
Parents immigrantsn.s.n.s.n.s.
Endurance athleten.s.*n.s.n.s.
At-peak athleten.s.n.s.n.s.
Training loadn.s.n.s.n.s.
Abuse victimisation
Sexual abusen.s.4.85 (1.45 to 16.3) (p=0.011)5.94 (1.42 to 24.9) (p=0.015)3.22 (1.17 to 8.82) (p=0.023)
Physical abusen.s.n.s.n.s.†
Bullyingn.s.n.s.‡2.63 (1.16 to 5.97) (p=0.021)
Athletics
Athletics injury previous yearn.s.n.s.n.s§
Sense of coherence
SOC-130.92 (0.87 to 0.97) (p=0.004)0.90 (0.85 to 0.96) (p<0.001)0.90 (0.85 to 0.96) (p=0.001)0.91 (0.88 to 0.95) (p<0.001)0.92 (0.88 to 0.96) (p<0.001)
Coping strategies (Brief COPE)
Self-blamen.s.¶1.84 (1.19 to 2.82) (p=0.006)1.60 (1.21 to 2.11) (p=0.001)1.40 (1.05 to 1.87) (p=0.023)
‘Exploiting support to take action’n.s.n.s.n.s.
‘Behavioural disengagement’1.51 (1.18 to 1.95) (p=0.001)1.51 (1.18 to 1.95) (p=0.001)1.26 (1.06 to 1.51) (p=0.011)1.33 (1.16 to 1.52) (p<0.001)
‘Humour and positive reframing’n.s.n.s.n.s.
‘Turning to religion’n.s.n.s.n.s.
  • *(0.30 (0.08 to 1.17) (p=0.084).

  • †(2.45 (0.87 to 6.93) (p=0.091).

  • ‡(2.57 (0.85 to 7.79) (p=0.095).

  • §(1.97 (0.89 to 4.36) (p=0.094).

  • ¶(1.46 (1.00 to 2.13) (p=0.051).

  • n.s, not significant at 5% level.