Table 3

Differences in pooled mean costs and effects (95% CIs), incremental cost-effectiveness (CE) ratios, and the distribution of incremental cost-effect pairs around the quadrants of the cost-effectiveness planes for PTED compared with usual care

Sample sizeOutcome measure∆C (95% CI)∆e (95% CI)ICERDistribution CE-plane (%)
PTEDOMPoints€/pointNESESWNW
Main analysis—imputed dataset179309Leg pain (range: 0–100, lower is better)−2786 (−4399 to −1181)6.9* (1.3 to 12.6)−402 Dominant0.199.40.50
179309QALYs (range: 0–1)−2825 (−4400 to −1222)0.040 (0.007 to 0.074)−70235 Dominant0.199.20.70
SA1—unadjusted outcomes179309Leg pain (range: 0–100, lower is better)−2543 (−4380 to −686)8.2* (2.5 to 13.9)−310 Dominant0.699.20.10
179309QALYs (range: 0–1)−2543 (−4380 to −686)0.052 (0.016 to 0.088)−48496 Dominant0.699.20.20
SA2—complete cases†130183Leg pain (range: 0–100, lower is better)−2083 (−3991 to −234)7.8* (1.5 to 14.0)−267 Dominant1.5980.50
130183QALYs (range: 0–1)−2133 (−4029 to −280)0.031 (−0.008 to 0.070)−68014 Dominant193.35.40.3
SA3a—cost of PTED=5000179309Leg pain (range: 0–100, lower is better)−2260 (−3876 to −650)6.9* (1.3 to 12.6)−326 Dominant0.698.90.50
179309QALYs (range: 0–1)−2300 (−3916 to −693)0.040 (0.007 to 0.074)−57167 Dominant0.598.80.70
SA3b—cost of PTED=Cost of OM179309Leg pain (range: 0–100, lower is better)−3212 (−4824 to −1610)6.9* (1.3 to 12.6)−464 Dominant099.50.50
179309QALYs (range: 0–1)−3251 (−4863 to −1651)0.040 (0.007 to 0.074)−80820 Dominant099.30.70
SA4—human capital approach179309Leg pain (range: 0–100, lower is better)−4111 (−6384 to −1919)6.9* (1.3 to 12.5)−594 Dominant099.50.50
179309QALYs (range: 0–1)−4179 (−6466 to −1983)0.040 (0.007 to 0.074)−103256 Dominant099.30.70
SA5—healthcare perspective179309Leg pain (range: 0–100, lower is better)−144 (−724 to 406)6.9* (1.3 to 12.6)−21 Dominant30.369.30.20.3
179309QALYs (range: 0–1)−152 (−731 to 398)0.040 (0.007 to 0.074)−3773 Dominant29.270.10.30.5
SA6 —including learning curve patients304309Leg pain (range: 0–100, lower is better)−2573 (−3995 to −1192)5.4 (0.7 to 10.1)−476 Dominant098.910
304309QALYs (range: 0–1)−2602 (−4028 to −1226)0.040 (0.012 to 0.068)−65097 Dominant0 .099.70.30
  • Please note that the difference in total societal costs of this table slightly differs from that of table 2. This is given by the fact that in the current table, a system of seemingly unrelated regressions was used for estimating cost differences, whereas linear regression was used for table 2.

  • *The difference measures improvement in leg pain symptoms; that is, positive number signalises a decrease in symptoms.

  • †Variable indicating preference for treatment was left out because it was constant in some of the bootstrapped samples.

  • ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios; NE, north east; NW, north west; PTED, percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy; QALYs, quality-adjusted life years; SE, south east; SW, south west.