Estimates for trajectories for WLC (A) and comparisons with active treatment groups (B1–3)
| Estimate | SE | 95% CI | |
| A. Estimates, SE and 95% CI for intercept (I), slope (S) and quadratic (Q) terms for WLC | |||
| I | 10.34 | 0.60 | 9.15 to 11.49 |
| S | −0.15 | 0.26 | −0.65 to 0.38 |
| Q | −0.01 | 0.04 | −0.09 to 0.07 |
| B. Estimates for differences between each group and WLC | |||
| B1. Differences in estimates for I | |||
| HIIT versus WLC | 0.26 | 0.87 | −1.46 to 1.97 |
| Yoga versus WLC | −0.34 | 0.86 | −2.02 to 1.34 |
| HIIT+yoga versus WLC | −1.27 | 0.83 | −2.89 to 0.35 |
| B2. Differences in estimates for S | |||
| HIIT versus WLC | −0.77 | 0.38 | −1.51 to −0.04 |
| Yoga versus WLC | −0.70 | 0.40 | −1.49 to 0.08 |
| HIIT+yoga versus WLC | −0.92 | 0.39 | −1.69 to −0.14 |
| B3. Differences in estimates for Q | |||
| HIIT versus WLC | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.00 to 0.22 |
| Yoga versus WLC | 0.08 | 0.06 | −0.05 to 0.20 |
| HIIT+yoga versus WLC | 0.11 | 0.06 | −0.01 to 0.23 |
Results from the SEM model estimating intercept, slope and quadratic term for WLC (section A) and comparisons of these estimates with those of the three active groups (HIIT, yoga, HIIT+yoga; section B). Bold text denotes p<0.05.
HIIT, high intensity interval training; SEM, structural equation model; WLC, waitlist control.