Table 2

Association between accelerometer-measured total and intensity-specific physical activity and incident T2D (n=59 325)

Events/number of participantsModel 1
HR (95% CI)
Model 2
HR (95% CI)
Model 3
HR (95% CI)
Model 4
HR (95% CI)
Model 5
HR (95% CI)
The total volume of physical activity (mg)
 P0–P10 (≤26.1)205/57281.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)
 P10–P50 (26.2–38.0)409/23 321 0.54 (0.46 to 0.64) 0.59 (0.50 to 0.70) 0.71 (0.60 to 0.84) 0.68 (0.57 to 0.80)
 P50–P90 (38.1–54.3)236/23 493 0.33 (0.28 to 0.41) 0.37 (0.31 to 0.45) 0.51 (0.42 to 0.62) 0.49 (0.40 to 0.60)
 P90–P100 (>54.3)34/5899 0.20 (0.14 to 0.29) 0.22 (0.15 to 0.32) 0.35 (0.24 to 0.50) 0.32 (0.22 to 0.47)
MVPA (min/day)
 P0–P10 (≤5.2)193/57581.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)
 P10–P50 (5.3–25.9)418/23 316 0.50 (0.42 to 0.59) 0.54 (0.45 to 0.64) 0.63 (0.53 to 0.75) 0.62 (0.52 to 0.74) 0.63 (0.53 to 0.75)
 P50–P90 (26.0–68.4)237/23 470 0.27 (0.22 to 0.32) 0.31 (0.25 to 0.37) 0.41 (0.33 to 0.50) 0.40 (0.33 to 0.49) 0.41 (0.34 to 0.51)
 P90–P100 (>68.4)36/5897 0.15 (0.10 to 0.21) 0.17 (0.12 to 0.25) 0.26 (0.18 to 0.38) 0.25 (0.18 to 0.37) 0.26 (0.18 to 0.38)
LPA (min/day)
 P0–P10 (≤202)135/57981.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)1.00 (ref.)
 P10–P50 (202.1–314)379/23 368 0.73 (0.60 to 0.89) 0.75 (0.62 to 0.92) 0.84 (0.69 to 1.02) 0.81 (0.66 to 0.98) 0.89 (0.73 to 1.09)
 P50–P90 (314.1–444)315/23 398 0.64 (0.52 to 0.78) 0.64 (0.52 to 0.79) 0.79 (0.64 to 0.97) 0.76 (0.62 to 0.93) 0.87 (0.70 to 1.07)
 P90–P100 (>444)55/5877 0.48 (0.35 to 0.66) 0.45 (0.33 to 0.62) 0.58 (0.42 to 0.80) 0.57 (0.41 to 0.78) 0.64 (0.47 to 0.89)
  • The analyses were all based on multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Bold face values indicate p<0.05.

  • Model 1: adjusted for age as the underlying timescale, adjusted for gender, total wear time and seasonality.

  • Model 2: adjusted for variables in Model 1+ ethnicity, educational attainment, household income, Townsend deprivation index, employment status and assessment centres.

  • Model 3: adjusted for variables in Model 2+ smoking status, alcohol consumption, healthy diet score, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and depression.

  • Model 4: adjusted for variables in Model 3+ PRS, genotyping array, and the first 10 principal components of ancestry.

  • Model 5: adjusted for variables in Model 4+ LPA or MVPA (MVPA and LPA were mutually adjusted, but not for the total volume of physical activity).

  • LPA, light-intensity physical activity; mg, milligravity; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity; P, percentiles; PRS, polygenic risk score; T2D, type 2 diabetes.