Table 1

Univariate comparisons for magnitude (°) and timing (percentage gait of cycle) of peak angles and ranges of motion (°) during stance, defining clinical improvement as markedly better.

VariableMarkedly better (SD) (n=7)Moderately better, same, moderately worse or markedly worse (SD) n=18Mean difference (95% CI)p Value
Forefoot relative to rearfoot motion dorsiflexion
 Magnitude of peak14.1 (5.2)11.3 (5.1)2.8 (−1.9 to 7.5)0.230
 Timing of peak51.8 (2.6)51.0 (2.5)0.8 (−1.5 to 3.1)0.489
 Range of motion7.9 (0.9)7.9 (2.5)0.0 (−1.4 to 1.4)0.987
Forefoot relative to rearfoot motion abduction
 Magnitude of peak3.0 (7.5)−0.8 (7.4)3.8 (−3.0 to 10.7)0.262
 Timing of peak39.2 (8.8)41.2 (11.6)−2.0 (−12.1 to 8.1)0.681
 Range of motion7.3 (2.5)7.5 (2.6)−0.2 (−2.6 to 2.2)0.856
Rearfoot relative laboratory eversion
 Magnitude of peak−5.4 (2.1)−3.1 (2.5)−2.3 (−4.5 to −0.1)0.045*
 Timing of peak29.6 (6.6)32.0 (6.0)−2.4 (−8.0 to 3.4)0.406
 Range of motion5.2 (1.2)6.0 (1.8)−0.8 (−2.3 to 0.8)0.313
Rearfoot relative to tibia eversion
 Magnitude of peak−8.7 (3.1)−7.6 (3.0)−1.1 (−4.0 to 1.7)0.412
 Timing of peak34.4 (4.2)32.3 (6.5)2.1 (−3.5 to 7.6)0.444
 Range of motion9.0 (1.7)9.5 (3.1)−0.5 (−3.1 to 2.1)0.676
  • Retained for discriminant analysis.

  • * p<0.05.