Author or Institution/year | Method | Sex | Age (year) | Cut-offs (mlO2/min/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
The European Group of Pediatric Work Physiology, 198628 | Based on expert judgement | Girls | Adolescents | 35.0 |
Boys | Adolescents | 40.0 | ||
The Cooper Institute for Aerobics Research (FITNESSGRAM), 200427 | Cut-offs were extrapolated from the thresholds established for adults | Girls | 10 | 39.0 |
11 | 38.0 | |||
12 | 37.0 | |||
13 | 36.0 | |||
≥14 | 35.0 | |||
Boys | ≥10 | 42.0 | ||
Ruiz et al (2007)29 | Cut-offs linked to current risk-based values via ROC analyses | Girls | 9–10 | 37.0 |
Boys | 9–10 | 42.1 | ||
Lobelo et al (2009)30 | Cut-offs linked to current risk-based values via ROC analyses | Girls | 12–15 | 36.0 |
16–19 | 35.5 | |||
Boys | 12–15 | 44.1 | ||
16–19 | 40.3 | |||
Present study (EYHS) | Cut-offs linked to current risk-based values via ROC analyses | Girls | 8–11 | 37.4 |
14–17 | 33.0 | |||
Boys | 8–11 | 43.6 | ||
14–17 | 46.0 |
EYHS, European Youth Heart Study; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.