Analysis of the suitability of some existing computerised cognitive test batteries for use in sporting settings
Test battery | Reference | Psychometric considerations | Practical considerations |
---|---|---|---|
Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) | Sahakian et al14 | Few alternative forms | Long administration time (1–2 h) |
Low reliability on some tests | Additional hardware requirements | ||
Stimulus randomisation | Expensive (requires trained tester) | ||
Provides cognitive profile | Automated analysis | ||
Lots of normative data | |||
Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) | Bleiberg et al29 | Infinite alternative forms | Short administration time |
Stimulus randomisation | No additional hardware requirements | ||
Provides cognitive profile | Requires trained tester | ||
Little normative data | Automated analysis | ||
Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) test battery | Wesnes et al27 | Many alternative forms | Short administration time (20 min) |
Acceptable to high reliability | Additional hardware requirements | ||
Stimulus randomisation | Expensive (requires trained tester) | ||
Provides cognitive profile | Automated analysis | ||
Lots of normative data | |||
CogState | Westerman et al26 | Infinite alternative forms | Short administration time (15–20 min) |
Acceptable to high reliability | No additional hardware requirements | ||
Stimulus randomisation | Inexpensive (self administered) | ||
Provides cognitive profile | Internet delivered | ||
Little normative data | Automated analysis | ||
CogScreen | Kane & Kay28 | Many (8) alternative forms | Short administration time (30 min) |
Acceptable reliability | Additional hardware requirements | ||
Stimulus randomisation | Expensive (requires tester) | ||
Provides cognitive profile | Automated analysis | ||
Some normative data |