Table 3

 Results of included studies for clinical outcome measures. Incomplete data were not included

Outcome measureStudy IDDxInterventionWkWMD (95% CI)RR (95% CI)p Value
AT, Achilles tendinopathy; C, control; CE, concentric exercise; CI, confidence interval; DASH, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand; DOS, duration of symptoms; Dx, diagnosis; F, frictions; FAOS, foot and ankle outcome score; EE, eccentric exercise; LET, lateral elbow tendinopathy; p, statistical significance; PT, patellar tendinopathy; RCT, randomised controlled trial; RR, relative risk; S, splint; St, stretching; US, ultrasound; VAS, visual analogue scale; VISA, Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment; WMD, weighted mean difference; Wk, week of data collection.
*Yes, much better /no pain; No, worse/no change/slightly better
Pain
Pain VAS (100 mm)Silbernagel 200152ATEE vs CE62.00 (−18.90, 22.90)0.85
1218.00 (−3.68, 39.68)0.10
2610.00 (−8.81, 28.81)0.30
Jonsson 200545PTEE vs CE1244.80 (20.09, 69.51)0.00004
Martinez-Silvestrini 200546LETEE+St vs CE+St68.00 (−8.02, 24.02)0.33
EE+St vs St
6−1.00 (−16.46, 14.46)0.90
Decrease in pain (Yes/No)*Stasinopoulos 200453PTEE vs US48.00 (1.21, 52.69)0.03
821.00 (1.40, 315.98)0.03
1621.00 (1.40, 315.98)0.03
EE vs F44.00 (1.11, 14.35)0.03
85.00 (1.45, 17.27)0.01
165.00 (1.45, 17.27)0.01
FAOS Pain Score (/100)Roos 200450ATEE vs EE+Sp121.40 (−19.16, 21.96)0.89
524.00 (−15.01, 23.01)0.68
EE vs Sp1214.00 (−6.56, 37.94)0.18
524.00 (−14.11, 22.11)0.67
Function
FAOS Sport/Rec score (/100)Roos 200450ATEE vs EE+Sp1217.00 (−8.87, 42.87)0.20
5210.00 (−17.94, 37.94)0.48
EE vs Sp1220.00 (−8.87, 45.87)0.13
528.00 (−17.89, 33.89)0.54
Plantarflexion (°)Silbernagel 200152ATEE vs CE122.00 (3.36, 7.36)0.46
Jumping test (cm)Silbernagel 200152ATEE vs CE120.00 (−4.89, 4.89)1.00
Toe raise Test (n)Silbernagel 200152ATEE vs CE12−2.00 (−14.55, 10.55)0.75
VISA scores (/100)Jonsson 200545PTEE vs CE1245.90 (24.54, 67.26)<0.0001
Visnes 200555PTEE vs C120.10 (−14.38, 14.58)0.99
Hamstring moment (Nm)Cannell 200157PTEE vs CE125.00 (−133.98, 143.98)0.94
Quadriceps moment (Nm)Cannell 200157PTEE vs CE12106.00 (−73.74, 285.74)0.25
DASH (/100)Martinez-Silvestrini 200546LETEE vs CE60.00 (−9.76, 9.76)1.00
EE+St vs St6−3.00 (−12.71, 6.71)0.54
Ko scores (/100)Selvanetti 200363LETEE vs US438.70 (29.75, 47.65)<0.00001
4839.20 (30.32, 48.08)<0.00001
Grip strength (mmHg)Martinez-Silvestrini 200546LETEE vs CE6−3.00 (−13.10, 7.10)0.56
EE+St vs St6−4.00 (−12.50, 4.50)0.36
Satisfaction/ Return to activity
Neisen-Vertommen 199259ATEE vs CE124.50 (0.63, 32.38)0.14
Mafi 200127ATEE vs CE122.25 (1.25, 4.05)0.007
Silbernagel 200152ATEE vs CE>261.56 (0.73, 3.32)0.25
Cannell 200157PTEE vs CE121.35 (0.81, 2.24)0.25
Jonsson 200545PTEE vs CE1217.27 (1.15, 260.07)0.04
>2617.27 (1.15, 260.07)0.04
Svernlov 200154LETEE vs St>261.06 (0.81, 1.39)0.68
Selvanetti 200363LETEE vs US>2621.97 (3.17, 152.20)0.002