Table 4 Studies investigating the efficacy of open kinetic chain and closed kinetic chain exercises in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome
Witvrouw et al31Witvrouw et al32Herrington et al46
Type of studyRandomised controlled trialRandomised controlled trialRandomised controlled trial
Groups60 PFPS patients randomly allocated into either OKC (n = 30) or CKC (n = 30) exercise group60 PFPS patients randomly allocated into either OKC (n = 30) or CKC (n = 30) exercise group45 male PFPS patients randomly allocated into 1 of 3 groups:Group 1—non-weight bearing single joint exercises (n = 15)Group 2—weight bearing multiple joint exercise (n = 15)Group 3—control, no treatment group (n = 15)
Treatment(1) Maximal static quadriceps muscle contractions(1) Maximal static quadriceps muscle contractionsKnee extension exercise in sitting position (resistance and number of sets and repetitions calculated daily based on an adjustable progressive resistive exercise technique for each participant)
(2) SLR in supine(2) SLR in supine
(3) Inner range quads exercises(3) Inner range quads exercises
(4) Leg adduction exercises in the lateral decubitus position(4) Leg adduction exercises in the lateral decubitus position
3 sets of 10 repetitions, isometric contraction held for 6 s with a 3 s rest in between3 sets of 10 repetitions, isometric contraction held for 6 s with a 3 s rest in between
(1) Seated leg presses(1) Seated leg pressesSeated leg press (resistance and number of sets and repetitions calculated daily based on an adjustable progressive resistive exercise technique for each participant)
(2) One third knee bends on one and both legs(2) One third knee bends on one and both legs
(3) Stationary bicycling(3) Stationary bicycling
(4) Rowing machine(4) Rowing machine
(5) Step-up/step-down exercises(5) Step-up/step-down exercises
(6) Programme of jumping exercises(6) Programme of jumping exercises
3 sets of 10 repetitions3 sets of 10 repetitions, 3 s rest between repetitions
Outcome measures18 VAS scores—at rest and on various activities Kujala scoring scale 0–10018 VAS scores—at rest and on various activitiesModified Kujala Questionnaire—pain level (ranging from 0–100) during stair climbing, squatting, running, jumping, and prolonged sitting. The presence of limp, swelling, subluxation, muscle atrophy examined as well as knee ROM deficits and the need for support when walkingVAS on step-up/step-downKnee extension strengthMeasured at start and after 6 weeks rehabilitation
Functional outcome measuresFunctional outcome measures
Muscle strengthMuscle strength
Muscle lengthMuscle length
Measurements taken before and after treatment, and after 3 monthsMeasurements taken before and after treatment and again after 5 years
ResultsBoth groups experienced a significant decrease in pain and an increase in functional performance. CKC group received significantly better functional results in some of the VAS scores which were not found in the OKC group. In CKC group, a significant increase in jumping distance was noted; however no significant increase noted in OKC groupAt 5 year follow-up, both groups demonstrated maintenance of good subjective and functional outcomes achieved after the treatmentNo significant difference was noted between groups on most parameters examinedOn 3 of the 18 VAS recordings, the OKC group showed significantly fewer complaints compared to CKC groupSubjects in both groups showed a statistically significant decrease in pain and an increase in strength and functional performance when compared with the control group. No significant differences were seen between the 2 exercise groups.
PEDro score6/107/106/10
  • CKC, closed kinetic chain; OKC, open kinetic chain; PFPS, patellofemoral pain syndrome; ROM, range of movement; SLR, straight leg raise; VAS, visual analogue scale.