Table 1

Quality assessment list for prospective cohort studies

Was the selection of the population non-selective with1  =  yes
respect to a healthy or physical functioning?0  =  no
?  =  unclear
Were the selected health outcomes clearly described?1  =  yes
0  =  no
?  =  unclear
The time between the measurement of physical fitness1  =  yes, >1 year
and the health outcome was at least 1 year0  =  no, ⩽1 year
?  =  unclear
Were the results adjusted for confounders?1  =  yes
0  =  no
?  =  unclear
Were standard errors and/or confidence intervals given1  =  yes
for the estimates or was information given to calculate0  =  no
these??  =  unclear
  • Rating for total score: high quality, 3–5; low quality, 2; very low quality, 1.