AuthorPublication year | Vara F et al242000 Abstract | Lohrer H et al252002 | Peers KHE et al62003 | Peers KHE252003 | Taunton KM et al272003 | Wang CJ et al132007 | Vulpiani MC et al142007 |
Study design | Randomised clinical trial, single-blind | Non-randomised, prospective pilot study | Retrospective cross-sectional analysis | Randomised clinical trial | Randomised clinical trial | Randomised clinical trial | Non-randomised, prospective cohort study |
Outcome measures | VAS score, pressure pain, functional improvement | Pain at rest, pain during exercise and pressure pain (all VAS scores), and pain-free running time (min) | VISA score, VAS score and R&M classification | VISA score, VAS score, R&M classification and functional improvement | VISA score and vertical jump test | VISA score, VAS score, R&M classification, functional improvement and echo image of patellar tendon | VAS score, subjective clinical evaluation range |
Follow-up period in months | 24 | 12 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 36 | >24 |
Number of patients (total/study group) | 27/14 | 45/45, all athletes | 27/14 (28/15 tendons), all athletes | 41/21, all athletes | 20/10, all athletes | 50/27 (54/30 tendons), all athletes | 73/73 (83/83 tendons), 15 athletes |
Duration of symptoms in months | ⩾6 | 13.9 | 23 | ⩾3 | 16.2 | ⩾3 | |
Severity before ESWT | VAS 1.6 | VAS 5 | VISA 54.4 | VAS 6.0 | VAS 7.1 | ||
VAS 5.5 (pressure pain), VAS 5.5 (during exercise), pain-free running time 10.4 min | VISA 46.5 | VISA 42.57 | |||||
Previous treatment before ESWT | Two of the following treatments: NSAIDs, physical therapy, steroid injections, patellar bracing, acupuncture or immobilisation | Two of the following treatments: NSAIDs, physical therapy or steroid injections | NSAIDs, physical therapy, steroid injections or patellar taping | NSAIDs | Steroid injections | NSAIDs or physiotherapy | |
ESWT type | Dolorclast | Siemens Sonocur | Sonocur Plus Siemens | Siemens Sonocur | OssaTron | STORZ | |
Radial | Focused | Focused | Focused | Focused | Medica Focused | ||
Energy level (mJ/mm2) | 0.105–0.437 (medium) | 0.06–0.18 (low-medium) | 0.08 (medium) | 0.2 (medium) | 0.17 (medium) | 0.18 (medium) | 0.08–0.44 (low-high) |
Number of treatments | 1–5 | 3–5 (2000 imp) | 3 (1000 imp) | 3 (1000 imp) | 3–5 (2000 imp) | 1 (1500 imp) | 3–5 (1500–2500 imp) |
Local anaesthetic | none | none | none | none | none | none | |
Method of localisation | patient-guided feedback | image guiding | image guiding | palpation | palpation, control by imaging | ||
Additional treatment after ESWT | none | none | Eccentric training, single leg decline squat | none | none | none | |
Mean VAS and VISA after ESWT (improvement) | VAS 0.3* (1.3) | VAS 1 | VAS 3 (2.0) | VISA 61.4*(7.0) | VAS 0.59*(5.41) | VAS 1.35* (5.75) | |
VAS 1.7* pressure pain (31.8) | VISA 83.9 | VISA 74.74*(28.24) | VISA 92.0* (44.43) | ||||
VAS 1.9* during exercise (3.6) | |||||||
painfree running time 70.3 min (59.9) | |||||||
Improved patients (%) | 74% (11/14) improved, good and satisfactory | 64.4% (29/45) improved, pain-free or less pain | 66% (10/15) improved, excellent and good | 61.9% (13/21) improved, excellent and good | 70% (7/10) improved, less pain, function improved | 90.1% (27/30) improved, excellent and good | 79.9% (66/83) improved and satisfied |
Significant differences in advantage of ESWT treatment | Yes | Yes | No significant difference between ESWT treatment and surgical treatment | Yes, except for VAS score and R&M classification | Yes | Yes, except for diameter and appearance of patellar tendon | Yes |
Delphi score | 3 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
Conclusion | Good results in favour of the group that received ESWT treatment with an energy level of 0.105–0.437 mJ/mm2 | ESWT does have a therapeutic effect on patellar tendinopathy | ESWT treatment is a good alternative for surgical treatment when conservative treatment fails for chronic patellar tendinopathy | ESWT positively contributed to the improvement of pain and function in the short-term treatment of patellar tendinopathy | ESWT treatment could be of value as an additional treatment to other conservative treatments, like eccentric training | ESWT was more effective and safer than conservative treatment in patients with chronic patellar tendinopathy | ESWT seems to be encouraging in light of the long-lasting improvement of the pain symptomatology |
Imp, impulses; R&M Classification, Roles & Maudsley classification ; VAS, Visual Analog Score, an index of severity of pain where patients with no pain have a score of 0 points; VISA, Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment questionnaire, an index of severity of patellar tendinopathy where asymptomatic, fully performing individuals have a maximal score of 100 points.34
For Delphi score see figure 2.23
*significant difference at p<0.05.