Table 3 Clinical trials of prolotherapy (PrT), polidocanol (Pdl), autologous whole blood (AWB) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection therapies for LE
Study/TypeSubjectsInterventionInjectant/controlAncillary treatmentFollow-up/outcome measuresResultsEffect size of pain score (Cohen’s d and % improvement)CommentsDelphi score, x/9
Zeisig et al 200825 Polidocanol RCT36 (16 female); mean age 46 (27–66) years; LE pain for mean 21 months; failed ⩾1 of: PT, eccentric PT, NSAIDs, steroid injections, orthotics, acupuncture, ultrasound, botox injectionsPdl: at 0 weeks, and optional at 12 weeks; U/S-guided, to “neovessels”; after their 1st injection session (in Pdl or comparison group), all subjects were offered Pdl injections at 12 weeks if unsatisfied with effects of first injection; 0.5–1 ml total
  • Pdl: 10 mg/ml;

None
  • 12, 52 weeks;

  • no between-group differences in pain score, grip strength or satisfaction;

Compared with baseline:At 12 weeks, unsatisfied control subjects were crossed-over to Pdl injections, if desired9
  • active comparison group: lidocaine + adrenaline; optional Pdl injections at 12 weeks (cross-over)

  • exertional pain (0–100 VAS); maximum grip strength; subject satisfaction (0–100% scale)

Cohen’s d: N/A
Pdl improved: 23%, adrenaline improved: 13%
  • 52 weeks:

Cohen’s d: N/A; Pdl improved: 51% (p<0.05),
adrenaline/Pdl improved: 47%
Zeisig et al 200643 Polidocanol prospective case series11 (7 female); mean age 46 (33–63) years; LE pain for mean 23 months; failed ⩾1 of: PT (7), NSAIDs (11), steroid injection (7), orthotics (5), acupuncture (2), ultrasound (2)Pdl: at 0 weeks;None
  • 12, 35 weeks;

  • Pain improved by 28 points at 12 weeks and 41 points at 35 weeks (p<0.05);

Compared with baseline:Prospective case seriesN/A
0.4–1.1 ml total
  • exertional pain (0–100 VAS); maximum grip strength; structural defect (yes/no) and degree of vascularity (0–2 scale) on U/S; subject satisfaction (0–100% scale)

  • grip strength, presence of structural defect and degree of vascularity improved at 12 and 35 weeks (p<0.05);

  • 35 weeks:

  • Mean subject satisfaction 83%

Cohen’s d: 1.4
Improved: 55% (p<0.05)
Scarpone et al 200831 Prolotherapy RCT24 (13 female); mean age 45.7 (19–62) years; LE pain for mean 1.9 years; failed NSAIDs, relative rest, PT, two steroid injectionsPrT: at 0, 4, 8 weeks, to tender points at supracondylar ridge, lateral epicondyle and annular ligament;
  • PrT: 10.7% dextrose + 14.7% sodium morrhuate

None
  • 8, 16, 52 weeks

  • At 16 weeks, pain improved (p<0.05) by 4.6 points compared with baseline, and 3.6 points compared with control;

Compared with baseline:Lack of consistent, long-term follow-up; unconventional assessment of grip strength8
1.5 ml total
  • Control: 0.9% saline

  • Resting elbow pain (0–10 VAS); isometric strength; grip strength; continuity of improvement at 52 weeks

  • at 16 weeks, isometric strength improved (p<0.05) compared with baseline and control; grip strength improved (p<0.05) compared with baseline;

  • 8 weeks:

  • at 52 weeks, qualitative improvement compared with control

PrT improved: 35% (p<0.05); control improved 20%
  • 16 weeks: PrT improved 90% (p<0.05), control improved 22%

Compared with controls:
PrT improved 68%;
Cohen’s d: 6.68:
Glick et al 2008 Prolotherapy RCT8 (2 female), mean age 50 years; LE pain for longer than 3 monthsPrT: at 0, 3 and 6 weeks to the lateral epicondyle and tender extensor tendon origin; 5 ml total
  • PrT: 15% dextrose and 1% lidocaine

All subjects used at-home stretching
  • 9 weeks; McGill Pain Questionnaire (0–45), Physical Composite score of MOS SF-36

  • McGill score improved (p = 0.086) by 7.75 points compared with baseline and 7 points compared with control

Compared with baseline:Lack of disease-specific outcome measure, short follow-up period7
  • Control: 0.9% saline and 1% dextrose

  • Physical Composite score improved (p = 0.05) by 8.4 points compared with baseline and control.

  • 9 weeks:

Cohen’s d statistic calculated to be 1.57 and 1.78 for the McGill and MOS measures respectivelyPrT improved: 66% (p<0.05); control improved 11.5%
Compared with controls:
  • 9 weeks:

Cohen’s d  = 1.6
Improved: 54.5% (p<0.09)
Lyftogt 200745 Prolotherapy Prospective case series20 (9 female), mean age 39 (24–64) years; LE pain for mean 6 monthsPrT: weekly sessions for mean 8 weeks; to tender points at common extensor tendon; 0.5–1.0 ml total
  • PrT: 20% glucose + 0.1% lidocaine

Modified daily activity
  • Weekly during intervention (mean duration of 7.2 weeks); final follow-up at mean 19 months;

  • pain improved by 6.8 points compared with baseline (p<0.05);

Compared with baseline:Unconventional subcutaneous prolotherapy technique with 10–15 injections per sessionN/A
  • Placebo: N/A

  • elbow pain (0–10 VAS); subject satisfaction (yes/no)

  • 100% of subjects satisfied

  • mean 19 months:

Cohen’s d: N/A
Improved: 94% (p<0.05)
Edwards et al 200347 Autologous Whole Blood Prospective case series28 (14 female); LE pain for at least 3 months; failed two or more conservative therapiesAWB: at 0, 6 weeks, and optional at 12 weeks; to extensor carpi radialis brevis; 2 ml total
  • AWB: whole autologous blood + 2% lidocaine or 0.5% bupivacaine;

400 splint; 3 weeks of motion restriction, then 3 weeks of stretching exercises
  • Every 6 weeks for at least 26 weeks (mean 9.5 months);

  • pain improved by 5.5 points by a mean of 3 weeks after last injection.

Compared with baseline:Prospective case series; no statistical comparisons reportedN/A
  • control: N/A

  • pain at rest (0–10 VAS); Nirschl scale (1–7)

  • Nirschl scale improved by 4.5 points by a mean of 3 weeks after last injection

  • after first injection:

Cohen’s d: 1.7
Improved: 40% (p<0.05);
  • after second injection:

Cohen’s d: 3.0
Improved: 88% (p<0.05)
Connell et al 200633 Autologous Whole Blood Prospective case series35 (12 female); mean age 40.9 (26–62) years; LE pain for mean 13.8 months; failed each of: rest, PT, steroid injectionAWB: 0, 4 weeks, and optional at 8 weeks; U/S-guided, to area of maximal structural discontinuity; 2 ml total
  • AWB: autologous whole blood;

  • 4, 26 weeks

  • Pain: median score 9, 6 and 0 at baseline, 4 and 26 weeks, respectively;

*Compared with baseline:Prospective case series; raw data, mean scores and statistical comparisons for some of the outcomes not providedN/A
  • Control: N/A

  • pain (0–10 VAS); Nirschl scale (1–7); U/S-assessed tendon thickness, hypoechogenicity, neovascularity; treatment satisfaction (yes/no)

  • Nirschl scale: median score 6, 4 and 0 at baseline, 4 and 26 weeks, respectively;

  • 4 weeks:

  • U/S: mean tendon thickness, hypoechogenicity and neovascularity improved (p<0.001)

Cohen’s d: 0.68;
  • 91% of subjects satisfied

  • 26 weeks:

Cohen’s d: 0.72
Gani et al 200746 Autologous Whole Blood Prospective case series26 (16 female); mean age 34 (21–54) years; LE pain for mean 2.1 years; failed rest, NSAIDs, activity modification, steroid injectionAWB: at 0 weeks, and optional at 6 weeks
  • AWB: whole autologous blood;

Sling for 1 week, then rest and stretching exercises; no heavy lifting for 3 weeks
  • Weekly, up until 35 weeks on average;

  • Pain improved (p<0.05) by 2.1 points at 35 weeks;

Compared with baseline:Prospective case series;N/A
  • control: N/A

  • Nirschl scale improved (p<0.05) from mean score 5.5 to 2.1 at 35 weeks

  • after up to two injections:

unconventional Likert scale as primary outcome
Cohen’s d: N/A
Improved: 64% (p<0.05)
Mishra et al 200636 Platelet-Rich Plasma non-randomised controlled trial20 adults; 15 PRP subjects: mean age 48.1 years, LE pain for mean 15.3 months; five control subjects: mean age 42 years, LE pain for mean 11.8 months; failed one or more of: NSAIDs, PT, bracing, steroid injectionPRP: single injection at 0 weeks
  • PRP: pH 8.4, approximately 3.3 million platelets per treatment session

  • Stretching exercises for 2 weeks, then formal strengthening exercise programme for 2 weeks

  • 8, 26, 108 weeks;

  • At 8 weeks, pain improved (p<0.05) by 33 points compared with control; compared with baseline, pain improved (p<0.05) by 47, 71 and 80 points at 8, 26 and 108 weeks, respectively;

Compared with baseline:Non-randomised design; three of five control subjects left study at 8 weeks; injected local anaesthesia used in both groups; 108 -week Mayo score not reported5
  • Control: bupivacaine + adrenaline

  • exertional pain (0–100 VAS); Mayo Elbow Performance Index; % subjects satisfied with therapy

  • 8 weeks:

  • 93% of subjects satisfied

Cohen’s d: N/A
Improved: 60% (p<0.05);
  • 27 weeks:

Cohen’s d: ; N/A
Improved: 81% (p<0.05)
Compared with controls:
  • 8 weeks: N/A

  • AWB, autologous whole blood; LE, lateral epicondylosis; N/A, not applicable; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; Pdl, polidocanol; PRP, platelet-rich plasma; PrT, prolotherapy; PT, physical therapy; U/S, ultrasound; VAS, visual analogue scale

  • *Median scores reported, per cent change therefore not calculated; Cohen’s d calculated using reported Z statistic.

  • Results reported for a final follow-up unless stated otherwise.