Neuromotor control paradigm comparisons where point estimates of effect and confidence intervals were able to be calculated
| Authors | Muscles | Intervention | Comparator | Mean difference (95% CI) | Effect size (ES) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nawoczenski and Ludewig44 | TA, MG, VM, VL, BF (% MVC) | Posted moulded | Control | TA: 37.5 (5.44 to 68.56), MG: −7.6 (−23.87 to 8.67), VM: −2.2 (−18.66 to 14.26), VL: −4.3 (−26.84 to 18.24), BF: −11.1 (−20.31 to −1.89) | 0.67, 0.26, 0.08, 0.12, 0.68 |
| Tomaro and Burdett45 | TA, PL, LG | Posted moulded | Control | TA duration: 2.6% (−2.89% to 8.09%) amplitude (μV), TA: 4 (−117.28 to 125.28), PL: −7 (−93.4 to 79.4), LG: 10 (−45.22 to 65.22) | 0.41, 0.03, 0.07, 0.16 |
LG, lateral gastrocnemius; MVC, maximum voluntary contraction; VL, vastus lateralis; VM, vastus medialis.