Table 2

Baseline, final and improvement scores for transversus abdominis recruitment and clinical outcomes, for all groups

MCE (n = 11)GE (n = 10)SMT (n = 13)
Transversus abdominis recruitment (% change from resting thickness)
 Baseline4.6 (7.7)13.7 (14.9)8.5 (11.3)
 Final12.4 (11.6)8.8 (12.1)4.9 (9.1)
 Improvement7.8 (12.8)−4.9 (10.7)−3.7 (10.9)
Perceived recovery, 25 to 5 (SD)
 Baseline−2.91 (1.64)−3.70 (1.06)−2.38 (2.32)
 Final2.09 (2.88)1.50 (3.24)3.08 (1.66)
 Improvement5.00 (3.10)*5.20 (2.94)*5.46 (2.85)*
PSFS, 1 30 (SD)
 Baseline11.09 (3.21)9.70 (4.14)11.62 (4.66)
 Final18.91 (6.55)14.50 (6.29)20.92 (5.66)
 Improvement7.82 (7.33)*4.80 (3.79)*9.31 (6.55)*
RM, 0–24 (SD)
 Baseline14.00 (4.94)12.70 (6.00)9.77 (5.93)
 Final7.36 (6.59)9.00 (6.04)4.15 (2.76)
 Improvement6.64 (5.68)*3.7 (5.06)*5.62 (5.09)*
Pain, 0–10 (SD)
 Baseline6.36 (2.20)7.50 (1.35)5.38 (2.22)
 Final4.00 (2.37)4.70 (1.77)2.92 (1.71)
 Improvement2.36 (3.20)*2.80 (2.70)*2.46 (2.33)*
  • Values are means and standard deviations. Change scores were calculated so positive scores are improvements.

  • * Significant at p<0.05. Transversus abdominis recruitment measured as change in muscle thickness as percentage of resting thickness. GE, general exercises; MCE, motor control exercise; PSFS, patient-specific functional scale; RM, Roland Morris disability questionnaire; SMT, spinal manipulative therapy.