Table 1

Description of included studies in the systematic review

AuthorsName of questionnairePsychometric evaluation(s)Time of administrationTarget populationStudy populationMode of administration
Kirmit et al57AAOS-HSInter-tester reliabilityPreop.Hip OAN=35 (IA)Observer-administered
18♀, 17♂
Mean (SD) 58.8 (2.2) y
Range (28–76 y)
Martin et al38HOSContent validityClinical visit/Postop.Labral tear/hip arthroscopyN=507 (IA)Self-administered
Internal consistency273♀, 232♂
Construct validityMean (SD) 38 (13) y
Range (13–66 y)
Martin et al42HOSConstruct validityPostop.Hip arthroscopyN=107 (IA)Self-administered
56♀, 51♂
Mean (SD) 42 (14) y
Range (14–79) y
Martin et al52HOSTest–retest reliabilityPreop./Postop.Hip arthroscopyN=126 (IA)Self-administered
Responsiveness59♀, 67♂
Mean (SD) 41 (16) y
Range (13–80) y
Klassbo et al35HOOSContent validityClinical visitHip OAN=52 (IA)Self-administered
Internal consistency35♀, 17♂
Construct validityMedian 64 y
Floor and ceiling effectsRange (42–84 y)
Test–retest reliability
Agreement
Nilsdotter et al41HOOSContent validityPreop./Postop.THRN=90 (ES)Self-administered
Internal consistency41♀, 49♂
Construct validityMean 71.5 y
Floor and ceiling effectsRange (49–85 y)
Responsiveness
Interpretability
de Groot et al43HOOSInternal consistencyClinical visit/Postop.Hip OA/THRN=162 (IA)Self-administered
Construct validityRange (31–88 y)
Floor and ceiling effects
Test–retest reliability
Agreement
Responsiveness
Interpretability
Johanson et al53HRQInternal consistencyPreop./Postop.THRN=98 (ES)Self-administered
Construct validityFollow-up: 3, 6, 12 months61♀, 37♂
Test–retest reliabilityMean (SD) 65 (10) y
AgreementRange (21–90) y
Responsiveness3 months N=98
Interpretability6 months N=62
12 months N=42
Franneby et al76IPQInternal consistencyPostop.Open groin-hernia repairN=200 (IA)Self-administered
Construct validity5%♀, 95%♂
Test–retest reliabilityMean (SD) 63 (14) y
Lequesne et al77LISHInter-tester reliabilityDuring clinical trialHip OAN=38 (ES)Observer-administered
Stucki et al32LISHInternal consistencyClinical visitHip OAN=22 (ES)Self-administered
Construct validity
Test–retest
Interpretability
Stucki et al33*LISHInternal consistencyClinical visitHip OAN=22 (ES)Self-administered
Construct validity
Ludwig et al44LISHInternal consistencyPreop./Postop.THRN=112 (ES)Self-administered
Construct validity39♀, 73♂
Test–retest reliability
Responsiveness
Dawson et al40LISHContent validityBaselineUnilateral hip painN=471 (IA)Self-administered
Internal consistencyFollow-up: 12 month60.5%♀, 39.5%♂
Construct validityRange (68–79 y)
Potter et al45MHHSConstruct validityPostop.Hip arthroscopyN=33 (IA)Observer-administered
InterpretabilityMean follow-up: 25.7 months19♀, 14♂
Mean 34.6 y
Range (21–56) y
Christensen et al36NHSContent validityClinical visitHip pain for 6 months, no signs of radiographic OAN=48 (IA)Self-administered
Internal consistency29♀, 19♂
Construct validityMean 33 y
Test–retest reliabilityRange (16–45 y)
Dawson et al29OHSContent validityPreop./Postop.THRN=220 (ES)
Internal consistency131♀, 89♂
Construct validityMedian 70.5 y
Test–retest reliabilityRange (35.8–89.6 y)
Responsiveness
Interpretability
Dawson et al30OHSResponsivenessPreop./Postop.THRN=186 (IA)
InterpretabilityFollow-up: 6 months117♀, 69♂
Median 70.5 y
Mean (SD) 69.4 (3.5) y
Range (37.5–89.6 y)
Fitzpatrick et al31OHSResponsivenessPreop./Postop.THRN=186 (IA)
Interpretability63%♀, 37%♂
Median age 70.5 y
Mean (SD) 69.4 (3.5) y
Range (37.5–89.6 y)
Fitzpatrick et al78OHSInternal consistencyPreop./Postop.THRN=7151 (ES)
ResponsivenessFollow-up: 3 and 12 months61.4%♀, 38.6%♂
InterpretabilityMean (SD) 67.8 (10.9) y
3 months N=6174
12 months N=5854
Dawson et al79OHSConstruct validityPreop./Postop.THRN=609 (ES)
ResponsivenessFollow-up: 1 y
Interpretability
Ostendorf et al48*OHSResponsivenessPreop./Postop.THRN=114 (IA)
Construct validityFollow-up: 3 months, 1 y62.3%♀, 37.7%♂
Floor and ceiling effectMean (SD) 67.6 (10.1) y
InterpretabilityRange (35.9–88.8 y)
Gosens et al54OHSContent validityPreop./Postop.THRN=150 (ES)Self-administered
Internal consistency98♀, 52♂
Construct validityMean 65 y
Test–retest reliabilityRange (38–85 y)
Responsiveness
Interpretability
Garbuz et al49*OHSConstruct validityPreop./Postop.THRN=402 (IA)Self-administered
Floor and ceiling effectsFollow-up: 12 months53%♀, 47%♂
ResponsivenessMean 61 y
Naal et al46OHSInternal consistencyPreop.THRN=105 (IA)Self-administered
Construct validity48♀, 57♂
Floor and ceiling effectMean (SD) 63.4 (11) y
Test–retest reliabilityRange (33–88 y)
Agreement
Wright et al37PASIContent validityPreop.THRN=72 (IA)Observer-administered
49%♀, 51%♂
Mean (SD) 64 (7) y
Range(17–92 y)
Wright and Young27PASIConstruct validityPreop./Postop.THRN=78 (IA)Observer-administered
Test–retest reliabilityFollow-up: 6 months45%♀, 55%♂
Inter-tester reliabilityMean 62.2 y
ResponsivenessRange (25–87 y)
Interpretability
Wright and Young28*PASIConstruct validityPreop./Postop.THRN=78 (IA)Observer-administered
Test–retest reliability45%♀, 55%♂
Inter-tester reliabilityMean 62.2 y
ResponsivenessRange (25–87 y)
Wright et al55PASIConstruct validityPreop./Postop.THRN=55 (IA)Self-administered
Test–retest reliability58%♀, 42%♂
Mean 65.6 y
Range (28–84 y)
Whitehouse et al80R-WOMAC-FSInternal consistencyPostop.THRN=716 (ES)Self-administered
Construct validityFollow-up: 36 monthsMean (SD) 73.6 (5.5) y
Range (65–93 y)
36 months N=665
Liang et al39 and Katz et al81THAOQContent validity*Preop./Postop.THRN=54 (IA)Self-administered
Construct validity36♀, 18♂
Test–retest reliabilityMean (SD) 60 (13) y
Range (25–82 y)
Stucki et al34WOMACConstruct validityClinical visitHip OAN=22 (ES)Self-administered
Wright and Young28*WOMACConstruct validityPreop./Postop.THRN=78 (IA)Observer-administered
Test–retest reliabilityFollow-up: 6 months45%♀, 55%♂
Inter-tester reliabilityMean 62.2 y
ResponsivenessRange (25–87 y)
Interpretability
Stucki et al33*WOMACInternal consistencyClinical visitHip OAN=22 (ES)Self-administered
Construct validity
Söderman and Malchau50WOMACInternal concistencyPostop.THRN=58 (IA)Self-administered
Construct validityFollow-up: 2–10 y38♀, 20♂
Floor and ceiling effectMean 71 y
Test–retest reliabilityRange (52–86 y)
Interpretability
Angst et al82WOMACResponsivenessPre-/post treatment.Hip OAN=93 (IA)Self-administered
3–4 weeks rehabilitation66%♀, 34%♂
Follow-up: 3 months
Nilsdotter et al83WOMACResponsivenessPostop.THRN=20 (IA)Self-administered
Follow-up: 3, 6 and 12 months13♀, 7♂
Mean 72.6 y
Range (52–86) y
Escobar et al84WOMACResponsivenessPreop./Postop.THRN=100 (IA)Self-administered
Interpretability56♀, 44♂
Mean (SD) 68.6 (10.3) y
Ostendorf et al48*WOMACResponsivenessPreop./Postop.THRN=114 (IA)Self-administered
Construct validityFollow-up: 3 months, 1 y62.3%♀, 37.7%♂
Floor and ceiling effectMean (SD) 67.6 (10.1) y
InterpretabilityRange (35.9–88.8 y)
Roorda et al47WOMACInternal consistencyPreop.THRN=180 (IA)Self-administered
Construct validity65%♀, 35%♂
Test–retest reliabilityMean (SD) 67.9 (10.7) y
Interpretability
Quintana et al51WOMACInternal consistencyPreop./Postop.THR6 month: N=379 (IA)Self-administered
Floor and ceiling effectFollow-up: 6 months, 2 y2 years: N=310 (IA)
Agreement
Responsiveness
Interpretability
Garbuz et al49*WOMACConstruct validityPreop./Postop.THRN=402 (IA)Self-administered
Floor and ceiling effectsFollow-up: 12 months53%♀, 47%♂
ResponsivenessMean 61 y
SooHoo et al85WOMACResponsivenessPreop./Postop.THRN=89 (ES)Self-administered
InterpretabilityFollow-up: 5–43 months54%♀, 46%♂
Mean 60 y
Range (20–91 y)
Soininen et al56WOMACConstruct validityPreop. /postop.THRN=33 (ES)Self-administered
Test–retest reliabilityFollow-up: 3 months
Agreement
Responsiveness
Interpretability
  • * Studies evaluating two questionnaires.

  • Evaluating content validity of THAOQ including experts but not including any patients.

  • ♀, female; ♂, male; AAOS-HS, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Hip Score; ES, enrolled in the study; HOOS, Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; HOS, Hip Outcome Score; HRQ, Hip Rating Questionnaire; IA, included in the analysis; IPQ, Inguinal Pain Questionnaire; LISH, Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip; MHHS, Modified Harris Hip Score; NHS, Nonarthritic Hip Score; OA, osteoarthritis; OHS, Oxford Hip Score; PASI, Patient Specific Index; Preop., preoperative; Postop, postopertaive; R-WOMAC-FS, Reduced Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index Function Score; THAOQ, Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcome Questionnaire; THR, total hip replacement; y, years.