Scores on the items of the quality assessment list (see table 1), with the total quality score for all positive validity/precision items (3–16) and the percentage of the maximum attainable score (%)
| Reference | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | Total | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Witvrouw et al9 | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | − | + | + | + | 7/9 | 78 | ||||||
| Malliaras et al17 | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | 5/8 | 63 | |||||||
| Crossley et al14 | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | + | 5/12 | 42 | |||
| Lian et al8 | (2) | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | + | − | 5/12 | 42 | ||
| Lian et al10 | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | 3/8 | 38 | |||||||
| Cook et al11 | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | + | − | − | 3/8 | 38 | |||||||
| Malliaras et al13 | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | 3/8 | 38 | |||||||
| Gaida et al12 | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | + | − | − | 3/8 | 38 | |||||||
| Krauss et al15 | + | + | − | + | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | 4/12 | 33 | |||
| Kujala et al7 | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | 3/12 | 25 | |||
| Lian et al8 | (1) | + | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | 2/8 | 25 | ||||||
| Ferretti et al16 | + | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | 2/8 | 25 |