Aglietti et al44 | (n=60) | 3 | 87 (any sport) | Sports participation level | Graft type comparison |
50 (preinjury) | Type of sport |
18 (competitive) | Participation intensity |
Aglietti et al80 | (n=68) Athletes | 6 | 93 (any sport) | Sports participation level | Surgical technique evaluation |
31 (preinjury) | Type of sport |
22 (competitive) | Participation intensity |
Aglietti et al62 | (n=60) | 4 | 95 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Graft type comparison |
55 (preinjury) | Sports participation level; type of sport |
Aglietti et al81 | (n=120) | 6 | 63 (any sport) | Sports participation level | Surgical technique evaluation |
56 (preinjury) | Participation intensity |
Bak et al71 | (n=132) Soccer players | 5 | 61 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Surgical technique evaluation |
61 (competitive) | Time from surgery to resume training, full competition |
Barrett and MacKenny45 | (n=45) | 4 | 87 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Surgical technique evaluation |
47 (preinjury) | Sports activity level |
51 (competitive) | |
Colombet et al76 | (n=200) | 6 | 85 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Surgical technique evaluation |
68 (preinjury) | Sport participation level |
49 (competitive) | |
Daniel et al5 | (n=91) | 3 | 86 (preinjury) | Type of sport; h/year sport participation | Treatment technique evaluation |
Deehan et al46 | (n=90) | 3 | 67 (any sport) | Sport participation level | Surgical technique evaluation |
Fabbriciani et al47 | Rugby players (n=18) | 4 | 100 (any sport) | Sports activity level | Surgical technique evaluation |
100 (preinjury) | Tegner Activity Scale |
100 (competitive) | Number return to preinjury sports level |
Feller and Webster13 | (n=65) | 4 | 54 (preinjury) | Cincinnati Sports Activity scale | Graft type comparison |
Number return to preinjury sports level |
Gobbi et al83 | (n=80) Regional or national level athletes | 6 | 65 (preinjury) | Number return to preinjury sports participation; Tegner Activity Scale | Surgical technique evaluation |
Gobbi and Francisco82 | (n=100) | 6 | 89 (any sport) | Number return to preinjury sports participation | Graft type comparison |
58 (preinjury) | |
Hasebe et al48 | (n=15) | 4 | 100 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Surgical technique evaluation |
33 (preinjury) | Tegner Activity Scale |
33 (competitive) | |
Heijne et al75 | (n=10) | 6 | 80 (any sport) | Number return to preinjury sports participation | Qualitative evaluation of return-to-sport outcome |
50 (preinjury) | Tegner Activity Scale |
Hofmeister et al63 | (n=22) | 4 | 91 (any sport) | Number return to preinjury sports participation | Functional outcome evaluation |
82 (preinjury) | |
Ibrahim et al84 | (n=85) Recreational and competitive athletes | 6 | 89 (any sport) | Number return to preinjury sports participation; Tegner Activity Scale | Graft type comparison |
Järvinen et al72 | (n=30) Recreational and competitive athletes | 4 | 27 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Surgical technique evaluation |
Järvelä et al58 | (n=72) | 3 | 78 (preinjury) | Number return to preinjury sports participation | Clinical follow-up |
Jerre et al74 | (n=275) Recreational and competitive athletes | 5 | 42 (preinjury) | Number return to sport | Outcome comparison |
31 (competitive) | Tegner Activity Scale |
Kocher et al26 | (n=201) | 4 | 78 (any sport) | Limitation in sports participation | Evaluation of patient satisfaction |
40 (competitive) | Athletic classification |
Kvist et al12 | (n=62) | 4 | 53 (preinjury) | Number return to preinjury sports participation | Psychological factors influencing return to sport |
31 (competitive) | |
Langford et al73 | (n=87) Competitive athletes | 5 | 51 (any sport) | Number return to full competition | Psychological factors influencing return to sport |
51 (competitive) | Anterior cruciate ligament return-to-sport index |
Lee et al78 | (n=64) Recreational and competitive athletes | 5 | 62 (any sport) | Return to preinjury sports participation | Return to sport |
44 (preinjury) | Tegner Activity Scale |
Makihara et al49 | (n=16) | 3 | 100 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Clinical evaluation |
Marcacci et al50 | (n=82) Professional and amateur athletes | 4 | 73 (preinjury) | Return to sport activities; time required to resume sport | Surgical technique evaluation |
Marcacci et al60 | (n=40) Professional and amateur athletes | 5 | 100 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Surgical technique evaluation |
90 (preinjury) | Return to preinjury sports participation |
Marcacci et al59 | (n=50) Professional and amateur athletes | 5 | 90 (preinjury) | Return to preinjury sports participation; Tegner Activity Scale | Surgical technique evaluation |
McDevitt et al51 | (n=95) Cadets and midshipmen | 3 | 99 (any sport); 99 (preinjury) | Return to preinjury sports participation | Rehabilitation protocol evaluation |
Mikkelsen et al52 | (n=44) | 5 | 91 (any sport) | Return to preinjury sports participation | Rehabilitation protocol evaluation |
39 (preinjury) | Time to return to sport |
Muellner et al70 | (n=40) Recreational and competitive athletes | 4 | 100 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Rehabilitation protocol evaluation |
Myklebust et al10 | (n=57) Three upper divisions of Norwegian team handball league | 5 | 88 (any sport) | Questionnaire: return to sport, recovery history, subsequent injury, rehabilitation, affects daily life function | Clinical evaluation |
58 (preinjury) |
Nakayama et al53 | (n=50) Competitive athletes | 4 | 100 (any sport) | Return to preinjury sports participation | Return to sport |
92 (preinjury) | Time from surgery to training |
92 (competitive) | Time to full return to sport |
Noyes and Barber-Westin64 | (n=56) | 4 | 75 (any sport) | Number return to sport; symptoms with sports activity; type of sport | Clinical evaluation |
O'Neill65 | (n=125) | 4 | 90 (preinjury) | Return to preinjury sports participation | Surgical technique evaluation |
Rebeyrotte-Boulègue et al54 | (n=55) | 4 | 100 (any sport) | Return to preinjury sports participation | Clinical evaluation |
71 (preinjury) | Reasons for reduced activity; Tegner Activity Scale |
Roos et al7 | (n=157) Soccer players | 3 | 22 (any sport) | Number return to soccer | Clinical evaluation |
22 (preinjury) | Number return to preinjury participation level |
22 (competitive) | |
Ross et al55 | (n=50) US air force cadets | 3 | 100 (any sport) | Preinjury and postop activity level; number return to sport; Cincinnati Sports Activity Scale | Participation outcomes |
Sandberg and Balkfors66 | (n=112) | 4 | 48 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Surgical technique evaluation |
18 (competitive) | Time to resume full activity |
Sauter et al61 | (n=50) | 3 | 72 (any sport) | Number return to sport | Surgical technique evaluation |
Seto et al67 | (n=25) | 3 | 96 (any sport) | Duration, frequency of preinjury and postop sports participation; number return to sport; postop participation level and symptoms | Clinical evaluation |
Shaieb et al56 | (n=70) | 5 | 41 (preinjury) | Return to preinjury sports participation; return to cutting sports; ability to do hard cuts, pivots | Graft-type comparison |
Shelbourne and Grey68 | (n=1057) | 4 | 95 (any sport) | Time to return to sport-specific activity; time to return to full capability | Rehabilitation protocol evaluation |
Shelbourne and Urch77 | (n=662) Competitive and recreational athletes | 6 | 54 (any sport) | Time to return to preinjury sports participation; number participating at full capacity at 4 months | Graft-type comparison |
Smith et al85 | (n=77) Competitive athletes | 5 | 81, 56 (any sport, preinjury at 12 months) | Return to preinjury sports participation | Outcome evaluation, return to sport |
60, 30 (any sport, preinjury at final follow-up) | Change in competitive level; Cincinnati Sports Activity Scale |
Webster et al57 | (n=220) Competitive athletes | 3 | 69 (any sport) | Number return to training, full competition; number planning to return to sport | Psychological factors influencing return to sport |
Wiger et al79 | (n=429) Competitive athletes | 6 | 39 (any sport) | Return to preinjury sports participation; Tegner Sports Activity Scale | Gender comparison of outcome |
Zaffagnini et al69 | (n=72) | 4 | 96 (any sport) | Marx Activity Rating System; Tegner Sports Activity Scale | Surgical technique evaluation |