Table 2

Summary of key characteristics of studies included in update review (shaded studies reported a significant positive effect on PA)

Target populationIntervention characteristics
ReferenceWeightAge (years)SexEthnicityTheory-basedSession typesLocationTargetType*Duration
Family-based interventions
 Chen et al 201036All8–10BothChinese AmericanSCTGroup, P/C separatelyOutside homePA and dietC: EDU + EXE
P: EDU
2 Months
 Hovell et al 200937All10–13BothGroup, P/C separatelyOutside homePA and dietC: EDU + EXE
P: EDU
2 Months
 Morgan et al 201038All5–12BothSCT/FSTGroup, P/C together and separatelyOutside homePA and dietEDU + EXE3 Months
 Reinehr et al 201039OV only8–16BothSystemic and solution-focused theoriesGroup, P/C together and separatelyOutside homePA and dietC: EDU + EXE
P: EDU
6 Months
 Sacher et al 201040OB only8–12BothLearning and SCTsGroup, P/C togetherOutside homePA and dietC: EDU + EXE
P: EDU
6 Months
 Shelton et al 200741OV/OB only3–10BothGroup, P onlyOutside homePA and dietEDU1 Month
Community-based interventions
 Black et al 201042All11–16BothNon-Hispanic black African-AmericanSCT/MIMentor, 1-1 with C, P presentAt homePA and dietEDU + EXE11 Months
 Farley et al 200743All7–14BothNANA – playground made availableOutside homePAENV2 Years
 Haire-Joshu et al 201044All5–12BothSCTMentor, 1-1 with C, info for POutside homePA and dietEDU∼6 Months
 Rosenkranz et al 201045All9–13GirlsSCTGroup (C only)Outside homePA and dietEDU + EXE6 Months
  • For full description of studies, please see supplementary table 2.

  • * Type of intervention categorised as: ENV (environmental) – changes to policy or physical environment; EDU (educational) – including giving information, working with participants to set goals, etc; EXE (exercise) – providing exercise sessions.

  • C, child; FST, family systems theory; MI, motivational interviewing; NA, not applicable; OB, obese; OV, overweight; P, parent; PA, physical activity; SCT, social cognitive theory.