Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology criteria | Oslo 2005 (%) | N | Tromsø 2008 (%) | N | p Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 135 | 164 | |||
Title and abstract | 10.4 | 14 | 12.3 | 20 | 0.611 |
Background/rationale | 53.3 | 72 | 98.2 | 160 | <0.001 |
Objectives | 82.2 | 111 | 95.1 | 155 | 0.012 |
Study design | 25.2 | 34 | 65.0 | 106 | <0.001 |
Setting | 43.7 | 59 | 65.6 | 107 | 0.002 |
Participants | 83.7 | 113 | 66.3 | 108 | 0.003 |
Variables | 20.7 | 28 | 74.2 | 121 | <0.001 |
Data sources/measurement | 77.8 | 105 | 86.5 | 141 | 0.118 |
Bias | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | – |
Study size | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | – |
Quantitative variables | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | – |
Statistical methods | 8.9 | 12 | 11.7 | 19 | 0.44 |
Participants | 0.7 | 1 | 10.4 | 17 | 0.001 |
Descriptive data | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | – |
Outcome data | 95.6 | 129 | 98.8 | 161 | 0.469 |
Main result | 94.8 | 128 | 98.8 | 161 | 0.376 |
Other analysis | 0.0 | 0 | 0.6 | 1 | 0.362 |
Key result | 96.3 | 130 | 98.2 | 160 | 0.677 |
Limitation | 0.0 | 0 | 0.6 | 1 | 0.362 |
Interpretation | 95.6 | 129 | 98.2 | 160 | 0.562 |
Generalisability | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | – |
Funding | 0.0 | 0 | 5.5 | 9 | 0.006 |