Table 4
Systematic review quality assessment
Items
Study
1
2
3
4
5
8
9
10
Total
%
Emery C
83
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
7
87.5
Foreman
et al
9
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
7
87.5
Prior
et al
10
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
7
87.5