Table 1

MRI case studies

StudySlavotinek et al (2005)Schilders et al (2007)Schilders et al (2009)Kunduraciogluet al (2007)Albers et al (2001)Lovell et al (2006)
Case-study group participants (incl. sports type, gender, age)52 athletes (Australian football)
 Male. Age: 17–31
24 athletes (19 soccer, 2 rugby, 2 runners, 1 squash)
Male. Age: 19–41
28 recreational athletes (14 soccer, 6 rugby, 3 golf, 2 squash, 2 cycling, 1 swimming, 1 triathlon)
Gender unknown. Age 18–50
22 athletes (21 soccer, 1 handball)
Male. Age 17–43
30 athletes (16 soccer, 5 football, other sports)
29 Male, 1 Female. Age 18–40
19 athletes (Australian football)
Male. Age 15–17
Inclusion criteriaAthletes from two teams of the Australian Football League with or without groin painCompetitive athletes, clinical adductor dysfunction, failure of non-operative treatment (rest, ice, NSAID, physiotherapy)Recreational athletes, participate in sports <4 days/week, clinical adductor dysfunction, failure of non-operative treatment (rest, ice, NSAID, physiotherapy)Elite athletes referred to sports clinic with a possible diagnosis of osteitis pubis and duration of symptoms >6 weeksPatients with pubalgia who are surgically confirmed as having pubalgia caused by abnormal musculofascial abnormalities (PAMA)Athletes from the Australian Institute of Sports, training 2 months prior to start of the study
Exclusion criteriaAthletes with pain not located in the pubic symphysis, pubic bones, adductor area or lower abdominal areaAny clinical evidence of sports hernia or osteitis pubis. Any clinical or radiographic evidence of pathological involvement of hip jointsAny clinical evidence of sports hernia or osteitis pubis. Any clinical or radiographic evidence of pathological involvement of hip jointsNot describedNot describedNot described
Clinical findings (1) type of examination
(2)findings
(1)Not reproducible
(2) 23 athletes have current groin pain, 18 a history of groin pain; 39 have tenderness on palpation of symphysis or adductor origin
(1)Reproducible (a.m. Hölmich)
(2) all athletes have unilateral adductor dysfunction at clinical examination
(1)Reproducible (a.m. Hölmich)
(2) all athletes have unilateral adductor dysfunction at clinical examination
(1) Not described
(2) all athletes have tenderness on palpation of symphysis. 6 have bilateral and 16 have unilateral groin pain. 6 athletes have pain at adductor muscle origin
(1) Not described
(2) 17 athletes with bilateral and 13 athletes with unilateral groin pain
(1) Not described
(2) one athlete with groin pain and tenderness at pubic symphysis at the start of the study
Diagnostic entity used by authorsNot definedClinical adductor dysfunctionClinical adductor dysfunctionOsteitis pubisPubalgiaOsteitis pubis
Radiology protocol (1) field strength and (2) sequences(1) 1.5T and 1.0T and (2) coronal and axial T1& T2 FatSat(1) 1.5 T and (2) coronal STIR, axial oblique T1 and axial oblique and sagittal T1 FatSat postintravenous gadolinium(1) 1.5T and (2) coronal STIR, axial T2, axial oblique T2 FatSat and axial oblique and sagittal T1 FatSat postintravenous gadolinium(1) 1.5T and (2) coronal T1 and STIR, axial T2(1) 1.5T and (2) coronal and axial T1&T2, axial STIR(1) 1.5 T and (2) coronal T1&STIR, axial STIR, athletes scanned three times (at start and after 2 and 4 months)
Additional radiological examinationsNonePelvic radiographsPelvic radiographsNoneNoneExtra MRI scan if athlete develops pain during study
Evaluation of MRI scans2 Radiologists blinded to clinical details. Diagnosis by consensus.
BMO (graded 0–3 and extent >2 cm)
Degenerative changes at symphyseal joint
1 Radiologist with full clinical details
Presence of contrast enhancement at adductor muscle origin
1 Radiologist with full clinical details
Presence of contrast enhancement at adductor muscle origin
1 Radiologist with full clinical details
BMO (not graded)
Degenerative changes at symphyseal joint
2 Radiologists blinded to clinical details. Diagnosis by consensus
BMO (not graded)
Degenerative changes at symphyseal joint
Musculotendinous structures of the groin and abdominal wall. Inguinal hernia, hip and SI joints
2 Radiologists blinded to clinical details. Diagnosis by consensus
BMO (graded 0–3)
Degenerative changes at symphyseal joint
Adductor muscle origin
Inguinal hernia
Reproducibility of radiologyInterobserver agreementNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
‘Gold standard’ usedNoneUltrasound-guided injection of local anaesthetic and steroid in symphyseal joint to treat painUltrasound-guided injection of local anaesthetic and steroid in symphyseal joint to treat painNoneSurgery (modified Bassini hernioplasty)None
Conclusions/results17 of 39 athletes have groin tenderness, and 19 of the total 52 athletes have severe BMO
Interobserver agreement for grading of BMO : κ=0.85 (good)
17 athletes with contrast enhancement at adductor muscle origin (enthesitis): 12 athletes with gradual onset of pain, 5 with acute onset
7 athletes without contrast enhancement at adductor muscle origin
No evidence of femoroacetabular impingement on radiographs
13 athletes with contrast enhancement at adductor muscle origin (enthesitis)
15 athletes without contrast enhancement at adductor muscle origin
No evidence of femoroacetabular impingement on radiographs
14 athletes with BMO
Degenerative changes present in 50% of the group of athletes
21 athletes with BMO, which in 20 corresponds to side of surgery
18 athletes with increased signal at adductor muscle origin
6 athletes with increased signal in pectineus muscle, 27 with attenuation of abdominal musculofascial layers
1 athlete with groin pain at start of study. 4 Athletes develop pain during study
Initially BMO in 11 athletes. Increase in severity of BMO during the training season.
BMO present in 2/3 of asymptomatic athletes
  • BMO, bone marrow oedema.