Table 3

Summary of trials of soft tissue massage for the treatment of shoulder pain

Author/yearConditionExperimental groupComparison group(s)Outcome measures
Soft tissue massage versus no treatment
van den Dolder and Roberts (2003)Patient group: unilateral shoulder pain with tenderness on palpation to muscles around shoulder
MOR: opaque envelopes
Two groups:
STM; no treatment
STM group
n=15 (11 males, 4 females)
Age=63.1±9.9 years
DOS=26 weeks (IQR 13–26)
Intervention: six sessions of STM aimed at lateral border of scapula EOR flexion, posterior deltoid EOR horizontal flexion, anterior deltoid EOR hand behind back, pectoralis major in stretch position over 2 weeks
No treatment group
n=14 (9 males, 5 females)
Age=65.9±9.2 years
DOS=30 weeks (IQR 23–91)
Intervention: no treatment for 2 weeks
Follow-up period 2 weeks
Outcome measures
Pain: Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire
Function: Patient-Specific Functional Disability Score
ROM:
Flexion (from photograph)
Abduction (from photograph)
Hand behind back (centimetre above/below PSIS)
Soft tissue massage versus active controls
Guler-Uysal and Kozanoglu (2004)Patient group: >2 months shoulder pain with limited ROM and pain on movement
MOR: not stated
Two groups: Cyriax; Ph mobilisations use low-grade/velocity, small or large amplitude passive movement techniques or neuromuscular techniques within the patient's ROM and within the patient's control. siotherapy group
Cyriax group
n=20 (5 males, 15 females)
Age=53.6±6.9 years
DOS=7.6±3.9 months
Intervention: Cyriax approach frictions and mobilisations, active stretching and pendulum exercises with PT, home exercises—pendulum and passive ROM
Three weekly hour sessions for 2 weeks
Physiotherapy group
n=20 (7 males, 13 females)
Age=58.4±9.7 years
DOS=5.6±3.9 months
Intervention: hot packs, SWD, active stretching and pendulum exercises with PT, home exercises—pendulum and passive ROM. Sessions five times per week for 2 weeks.
Three weekly hour sessions for 2 weeks
Follow-up period 2 weeks
Outcome measures
Pain:
Spontaneous pain using VAS
Night pain using VAS
Pain with motion using VAS
Passive ROM: using goniometer
Flexion
Abduction
Internal rotation
External rotation
Hains et al (2010)Patient group: Shoulder pain ≥5 out of 10 VAS score on a daily basis for ≥3 months
MOR: opaque envelopes with 2/3 even—1/3 odd random numbers
Two groups: sustained pressure to trigger points in shoulder; sustained trigger points to cervical and upper thoracic region
Sustained pressure to trigger points in shoulder group
n=41 (21 males, 20 females)
Age=46.5±8.8 years
DOS=4.0±3.9 years
Intervention: 15 treatments (timeframe not stated) of 15 s pressure on each trigger points supraspinatus, deltoid, infraspinatus muscles and biceps tendon. Position of arm during treatment not specified
Sustained pressure to trigger points in neck and upper thoracic region group
n=18 (5 males, 13 females)
Age=45.6±7.4 years
DOS=4.9±4.2 years
Intervention: 15 treatments (timeframe not stated) of 15 s pressure on each trigger points in neck and upper thoracic regions
Follow-up period
Immediately following 15 treatments, 30 days, 6 months
Outcome measures
Pain and function: using Shoulder Pain and Disability Index
Perceived improvement: using numerical scale from 0% to 100%
  • ADL, activities of daily living; AROM, active range of movement; DOS, duration of symptoms; EOR, end of range; IQR, IQ range; IR/ER, internal rotation/external rotation; MOR, method of randomisation; n, number of participants in group; PSIS, posterior superior iliac spine; PT, physiotherapy; ROM, range of motion; SWD, short wave diathermy; STM, soft tissue massage; VAS, visual analogue scale.