Implementation of the neuromuscular training programme according to the RE-AIM SSM framework
| RE-AIM SSM dimension | National (n=1) | District (n=8) | Trial coaches (n=173) | Current coaches (n=179) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respondent characteristics | ||||
| Males, n (%) | – | 6 (75) | 126/173 (73) | 132/179 (74) |
| Age, years (SD) | – | – | 46.3 (6.4) | 43.8 (5.9) |
| Reach | ||||
| Knowledge of the programme, n (%) | CG 80/81 (99) | 162/179 (91) | ||
| Effectiveness | ||||
| Injury prevention NRS, median (IQR)* | 8 (2) | 8 (3) | ||
| Performance improvement NRS, median (IQR)* | 8 (3) | 8 (2) | ||
| Satisfaction NRS, median (IQR)* | 8 (2) | 8 (3) | ||
| Coaches receiving complaints from players, n (%) | ||||
| More than a few | 5/126 (4) | |||
| A few | 49/126 (39) | |||
| No complaints | 72/126 (57) | |||
| Coaches receiving complaints from parents, n (%) | ||||
| More than a few | 0/124 | |||
| A few | 6/124 (5) | |||
| No complaints | 118/124 (95) | |||
| Adoption | ||||
| Coaches using the programme, n (%) | IG 49/68 (72); CG 40/69 (58) | 132/179 (74) | ||
| Implementation | ||||
| Fidelity with the programme, n (%) | ||||
| Use every week | 63/179 (35) | |||
| Use sporadically | 69/179 (39) | |||
| Do not use the programme | 47/179 (26) | |||
| Use the entire programme† | 10/43 (23) | 34/130 (26) | ||
| Use programme with modifications† | 33/43 (77) | 96/130 (74) | ||
| Maintenance | ||||
| Presence of policies for programme implementation and use, n (%) | ||||
| Formal policy | Yes | 0 | ||
| Informal policy | 2 (25) | |||
| Plans for policy | 4 (50) | |||
| No policy | 2 (25) | |||
| Routines for programme use, n (%) | ||||
| Have routines | 16/178 (9) | |||
| Have plans | 8/178 (5) | |||
| No routines or do not know | 154/178 (87) | |||
| Education via the club, n (%) | ||||
| Education offered | 45/175 (26) | |||
| Plans to offer education | 10/175 (6) | |||
| No education | 77/175 (44) | |||
| Do not know | 43/175 (25) | |||
| Annual education for physiotherapists, n (%) | ||||
| 2010 | Yes | 3 (38) | ||
| 2011 | Yes | 2 (25) | ||
| 2012 | Yes | 2 (25) | ||
| Use of the programme in 2010, n (%)‡ | ||||
| Use every week | IG 29/56 (52); CG 20/69 (29) | |||
| Use sporadically | IG 19/56 (34); CG 25/69 (36) | |||
| Do not use the programme | IG 8/56 (14); CG 24/69 (35) | |||
| Use of the programme in 2011, n (%)‡ | ||||
| Use every week | IG 13/34 (38); CG 11/34 (32) | |||
| Use sporadically | IG 9/34 (26); CG 14/34 (41) | |||
| Do not use the programme | IG 12/34 (35); CG 9/34 (26) | |||
| Use of the programme in 2012, n (%)‡ | ||||
| Use every week | IG 6/16 (38); CG 6/22 (27) | |||
| Use sporadically | IG 7/16 (44); CG 9/22 (41) | |||
| Do not use the programme | IG 3/16 (19); CG 7/22 (32) | |||
| Intention to continue using the programme, n (%) | IG 18/30 (60); CG 22/30 (73) | |||
*Median NRS (0–10 scale where 0 represented the least favourable option and 10 the most favourable) reported for trial coaches n=124–126, and current coaches n=104–106.
†Reported for the coaches who used of the programme.
‡Reported for the total number of trial coaches still active each respective year.
CG, control group in the RCT; IG, intervention group in the RCT; NRS, numerical rating scale (0–10); RE-AIM SSM, Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance Sports Setting Matrix.