Table 2

Scores on the items of the quality assessment list (see table 1), with the total quality score for all positive (+) items (#3–16) and the percentage of the maximum attainable score (%)

Reference12345678910111213141516TotalPer cent
Gehlsen and Seger11+++++3/1225
Messier and Pittala12+++++4/1233
Tweed et al13++++++4/1233
Viitasalo and Kvist14++++++4/1233
Bandholm et al15+++++++5/1242
Madeley et al7+++++++5/1242
Rathleff et al20+++++++5/1242
Moen et al8++++++++6/1250
Newman et al31++++++++7/1258
Lilletvedt et al21++++2/825
Franklyn et al10++++++4/850
Sommer et al30++++++4/850
Bennett et al16+++++3/933
Delacerda17++++++4/944
Sharma et al3++++++4/944
Hubbard et al18++++++++6/967
Raissi et al19++++++++6/967
Rauh et al2++++++++6/967
Yates and White4++++++++6/967
Plisky et al22+++++++++7/978
Yagi et al9++++++++7/978
  • Case–control studies: 8 possible points, cross-sectional studies: 12 possible points, prospective cohort studies: 9 possible points.