Component rating | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Representativeness | Design | Confounders | Blinding | Methods | Drop-outs | Global rating |
Andersen et al31 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate |
Bangsbo et al30 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Carrasco et al33 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | Strong | Moderate | Weak |
Helge et al32 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate |
Knoepfli-L. et al23 | Weak | Strong | Moderate | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate |
Krustrup24 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak |
Krustrup et al25 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate |
Krustrup et al26 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | Strong | Moderate | Weak |
Krustrup et al28 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak |
Meyers and Vaquero34 | Weak | Strong | Weak | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak |
Nybo et al37 | Weak | Strong | Weak | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak |
Randers et al29 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate |
Randers et al27 | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | Strong | Weak | Weak |
*Effective Public Health Practice Project,10 see details in the text.