TableĀ 3

Quality assessment of the intervention studies according to the EPHPP tool*

Component rating
StudyRepresentativenessDesignConfoundersBlindingMethodsDrop-outsGlobal rating
Andersen et al31WeakStrongStrongModerateStrongModerateModerate
Bangsbo et al30WeakStrongStrongModerateStrongStrongModerate
Carrasco et al33WeakStrongStrongWeakStrongModerateWeak
Helge et al32WeakStrongStrongModerateStrongModerateModerate
Knoepfli-L. et al23WeakStrongModerateModerateStrongModerateModerate
Krustrup24WeakStrongStrongWeakStrongStrongWeak
Krustrup et al25WeakStrongStrongModerateStrongModerateModerate
Krustrup et al26WeakStrongStrongWeakStrongModerateWeak
Krustrup et al28WeakStrongStrongWeakStrongStrongWeak
Meyers and Vaquero34WeakStrongWeakWeakStrongStrongWeak
Nybo et al37WeakStrongWeakWeakStrongStrongWeak
Randers et al29WeakStrongStrongModerateStrongModerateModerate
Randers et al27WeakStrongStrongWeakStrongWeakWeak
  • *Effective Public Health Practice Project,10 see details in the text.