Table 7

Importance and threshold scores identified for PROs

PRON1ImportantNot importantUnfamiliarN2OperativeNon-operative
Operative
Non-operative
Operative
Non-operative
Median
(1Q, 3Q)
Median
(1Q, 3Q)
GRS1374
1261
45%32%17%123
107
90
(90, 90)
90
(85, 90)
KOS-SAS1386
1267
42%35%18%87
75
90
(80, 90)
90
(80, 90)
KOS-ADLS1382
1266
41%36%17%95
84
90
(80, 90)
90
(80, 90)
IKDC20001377
1262
38%33%24%87
70
90
(85, 90)
90
(85, 90)
KOOS1379
1263
37%38%18%56
48
85
(80, 90)
85
(80, 90)
Lysholm1382
1269
36%36%22%94
76
90
(85, 90)
85
(82.5, 90)
Cincinnati1363
1253
29%42%22%33
25
90
(80, 90)
90
(80, 90)
Tegner1379
1268
29%38%28%38
32
7
(6, 8)
7
(5,8)
Marx1354
1247
13%42%40%10
7
12
(8.5, 12)
12
(10, 12)
  • 1Q, the first quartile representing the 25th centile; 3Q, the third quartile representing the 25th centile; Cincinnati, Cincinnati Knee Score; GRS, global rating scale; IKDC2000, International Knee Documentation Committee 2000 Subjective Knee Form; KOS-ADLS, Knee Outcome Score—Activities of Daily Living Scale; KOS-SAS, Knee Outcome Score—Sports Activities Scale; Lysholm, Lysholm Knee Score; Marx, Marx Activity Rating Scale; N1, the number of respondents concerning the importance of each PRO (maximum 1490 operative, 1326 non-operative); N2, the number of respondents who provided a valid threshold score for defining success on each measure; PRO, patient reported outcome; Tegner, Tegner Activity Scale.