Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of dietary fat feedback on behavioral and psychological variables

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on the immediate and delayed reactions to dietary fat consumption feedback. Subjects in our study received (1) personalized dietary fat feedback and (2) information about how to alter their fat consumption. Fat consumption was measured using a brief fat assessment instrument. Subjects were categorized into three risk groups: at or below, above, and significantly above the recommended level. Emotional, cognitive, and behavioral reactions were measured immediately after receiving feedback and at 1 month postfeedback. Subjects who received high fat feedback showed greater negative emotional distress in response to the feedback and stated that they knew less about high-fat foods than subjects receiving lower feedback. By the 1-month follow-up, subjects in the highest feedback condition were least likely to report intentions to lower their dietary fat. Interventions designed to alter dietary fat consumption should take into account the emotional and cognitive consequences of risk factor feedback.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aronson, V., and Fitzgerald, B. (1980).Guidebook for Nutrition Counselors, Christopher Publishing House, North Quincy, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986).Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D. J., and Tinker, L. F. (in press). Controversies in dietary behavior change. In F. Bronner (Ed.),Controversies in Nutrition. Elsevier, New York.

  • Bowen, D. J., Meischke, H., and Tomoyasu, N. (1994). Defining the processes of low-fat dietary change,Health Educ. Res 9: 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croyle, R. T., and Jemmott, J. B. (1991). Psychological reactions to risk factor testing. In Skelton and Croyle, R. T. (eds.),Mental Representation in Health and Illness, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, S. J., Kristal, A. R., and Bowen, D. J. (1992). An application of the stage model of behavior change to dietary fat reduction.Health Educ. Q. 7: 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, H. (1991). Cholesterol Labeling: Psychological Responses to Risk Factor Feedback, Unpublished dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristal, A. R., Shattuck, A. L., Henry, H. J., and Fowler, A. (1990). Rapid assessment of dietary intake of fat, fiber, and saturated fat: Validity of an instrument suitable for community intervention research and nutritional surveillance.Am. J. Health Promot. 4: 288–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In Berkowitz, L. (ed.),Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 13, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H., and Cameron, L. (1987). Behavioral theories and the problem of compliance.Patient Educ. Counsel. 10: 117–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, L. A., Sackett, D. L., Haynes, R. B., and Taylor, D. W. (1984). Labeling in hypertension: A review of the behavioral and psychological consequences.J. Chron. Dis. 37: 933–942.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Health Statistics (1983).Dietary Intake Source Data: United States, 1976–80. (DHHS Publication No. PHS 83-1681), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. National Cholesterol Education Program (1990).Report of the Expert Panel on Population Strategies for Blood Cholesterol Reduction, NIH Publ. No. 90-3046, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1986).What is America Eating? National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1989).Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk, National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, A., and Frankle, R. (1986).Nutrition in the Community: The Art of Delivering Services, 2nd ed, Times Mirror/Mosby, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock, I. M., Strecher, V. J., and Becker, M. H. (1988). Social learning theory and the health belief model.Health Educ. Q. 17: 175–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, D. L., MacDonald, L., Haynes, R. B., and Taylor, D. W. (1983). Labeling of hypertensive patients.N. Engl. J. Med. 309: 1253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, G. S. (1982). Social comparison and perceptions of health and illness. In Sanders, G. S., and Suls, J. (eds.),Social Psychology of Health and Illness, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simko, M. D., Cowell, C., and Gilbride, J. A. (1984).Nutrition Assessment: A Comprehensive Guide for Planning Intervention, Aspen, Rockville, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (1983). Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognition adaptation.Am. Psychol. 1161–1173.

  • Taylor, S. E., Buunk, B. P., and Aspinwall, L. G. (1990). Social comparison, stress, and coping.Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 16: 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bowen, D.J., Fries, E. & Hopp, H.P. Effects of dietary fat feedback on behavioral and psychological variables. J Behav Med 17, 589–604 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857599

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857599

Key Words

Navigation