Skip to main content
Log in

Randomised controlled trial of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps after proximal femoral fracture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims: Proximal femoral fracture is often associated with long-term residual disability. Quadriceps weakness may be a factor in poor outcome. This study aimed to determine whether training of the quadriceps using electrical stimulation (ES) increases leg extensor power and decreases disability in elderly subjects rehabilitating after fracture. Methods: A single-blind randomized controlled trial of elderly postsurgical proximal femoral fracture patients, comparing 6 weeks of supplementary electrical stimulation of the quadriceps (15 patients) to usual physiotherapy alone (11 patients). The electrical stimulation on:off duty cycle was 7:23 seconds, with 36 cycles per session, given daily as an in-patient and twice weekly after discharge. The primary outcome measure was change in leg extensor power (Nottingham Power Rig). Functional mobility (Elderly Mobility Scale), disability (Barthel Index) and health status (Nottingham Health Profile) were also measured. Results: There was no significant difference in change in leg extensor power, or any other outcome measure, in the ES group compared to usualcare controls. Fractured leg extensor power increased by 10.9 (standard error of the mean 2.1) Watts at 6 weeks in the ES group compared to 15.3 (5.5) in the controls (mean adjusted difference −3.1, 95% CI −7.8, 1.6 Watts). Only 3 (20%) of the intervention patients tolerated sufficient stimulation intensity to produce repetitive knee extension, while 11 (73%) sustained palpable or visible contractions with no leg movement. Conclusion: A 6-week program of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps did not increase leg extensor power, or reduce disability, in elderly patients rehabilitating after surgical fixation of proximal femoral fracture. In many patients local discomfort limited the intensity of electrical stimulation that could be delivered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Keene GS, Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures. BMJ 1993; 307: 1248–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Marottoli RA, Berkman LF, Cooney LM Jr. Decline in physical function following hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 40: 861–6. 1992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Anianson A, Zetterberg C, Hedberg M, Hendriksson KG. Impaired muscle function with ageing: a background factor in the incidence of proximal femoral fracture. Clin Orthop 1984; 191: 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lamb SE, Morse RE, Grimley Evans J. Mobility after proximal femoral fracture: the relevance of leg extensor power, postural sway and other factors. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 308–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell SL, Statt DJ, Martin BJ, Grant SJ. Randomized controlled trial of quadriceps training after proximal femoral fracture. Clin Rehab 2001; 15: 282–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Martin TP, Gundersen LA, Blevins FT, Coutts RD. The influence of functional electrical stimulation on the properties of vastus lateralis fibres following total knee arthroplasty. Scand J Rehabil Med 1991; 23: 207–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barber M, Braid V, Mitchell SL, et al. Electrical stimulation of quadriceps during rehabilitation following proximal femoral fracture. Int J Rehabil Res 2002; 25: 61–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamb SE, Oldham JA, Morse RE, Evans JG. Neuromuscular stimulation of the quadriceps muscle after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1087–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rooney JG, Currier DP, Nitz AJ. Effect of variation in the burst and carrier frequency modes of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on pain perception of healthy subjects. Phys Ther 1992; 72: 800–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kramer JF. Effect of electrical stimulation current frequencies on isometric knee extension torque. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 31–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bassey EJ, Short AH. A new method for measuring power output in a single leg extension: feasibility, reliability and validity. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1990; 60: 385–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Presser L, Canby A. Further validation of the Elderly Mobility Scale for measurement of mobility of hospitalised elderly people. Clin Rehab 1997; 11: 338–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Maryland State Med J 1965; 14: 61–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Petrella JK, Miller LS, Cress ME. Leg extensor power, cognition, and functional performance in independent and marginally dependent older adults. Age Ageing 2004; 33: 342–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Stott.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braid, V., Barber, M., Mitchell, S.L. et al. Randomised controlled trial of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps after proximal femoral fracture. Aging Clin Exp Res 20, 62–66 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324749

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03324749

Keywords

Navigation