Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decrease of knee flexion torque in patients with ACL reconstruction: combined analysis of the architecture and function of the knee flexor muscles

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

A decrease of deep knee flexion torque after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, using a semitendinosus (and gracilis) tendon, has been reported. However, the cause of this weakness remains controversial. Architectural and functional differences in the knee flexor muscles influence this weakness. the fiber length of the semitendinosus, gracilis, semimembranosus, and biceps femoris were directly measured in six human cadavers. The flexion torque and EMG of the hamstrings were measured in both limbs of 16 patients (23±5 years) after ACL reconstruction (12–43 months post-operation), using ipsilateral semitendinosus tendon. Magnetic resonance imagings were taken, over both the thighs of those patients, to measure muscle volume and to confirm a state of semitendinosus tendon regeneration. The position of the musculotendinous junction of the semitendinosus was also analyzed. The fiber length of the semitendinosus and gracilis were three to four times longer than that of the semimembranosus and biceps femoris. The difference of flexion torque between the normal and ACL reconstructed limbs significantly increased as the knee flexion angle increased. The EMG value for the semimembranosus and biceps femoris of both limbs as well as the semitendinosus of the ACL reconstructed limbs, significantly reduced as the knee flexion angle was increased. The volume of the semitendinosus in the reconstructed limb was significantly smaller than in normal limbs. The regeneration of the semitendinosus tendon was confirmed in all subjects, and the musculotendinous junction position of the reconstructed limb in almost all subjects was found in further image from the knee joint space than that for the normal limb. The decrease of deep knee flexion torque, after ACL reconstruction, could be due to the atrophy and shortening of the semitendinosus after its tendon has been harvested, as well as the lack of compensation from the semimembranosus and biceps femoris, due to the architectural differences between the semitendinosus and the semimembranosus and biceps femoris.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Zaccherotti G, et al (1994) Patellar tendon versus doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 22:211–218

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Akima H, Kuno S, Fukunaga T, et al (1995) Architectural properties and specific tension of human knee extensor and flexor muscles based on magnetic resonance imaging. Jpn J Phys Fitness Med 44:267–278

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armour T, Forwell L, Litchfield R, et al (2004) Isokinetic evaluation of internal/external tibial rotation strength after the use of hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:1639–1643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter TR, Edinger S (1999) Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: hamstring versus patellar tendon. Arthroscopy 15:169–172

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Corry IS, Webb JM, Clingeleffer AJ, et al (1999) Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-standard hamstring tendon autograft. Am J Sports Med 27:444–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cross MJ, Roger G, Kujawa P, et al (1992) Regeneration of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons following their transection for repair of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 20:221–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Delagi EF (1981) Anatomic guide for the electromyographyer, 2nd edn. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, IL

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, et al (2001) A comparison of quadrupled semitendinosus and patellar tendon grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:348–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Eriksson K, Larsson H, Wredmark T, et al (1999) Semitendinosus tendon regeneration after harvesting for ACL reconstruction. A prospective MRI study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:220–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frank CB, Jackson DW (1997) The science of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1556–1576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friederich JA, Brand RA (1990) Muscle fiber architecture in the human lower limb. J Biomech 23:91–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harter RA, Osternig LR, Singer KM, et al (1988) Long-term evaluation of knee stability and function following surgical reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Am J Sports Med 16:434–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Herzog W (1993) Lines of action and moment arms of the major force-carrying structures crossing the human knee joint. J Anat 182:213–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Karlson JA, Steiner ME, Brown CH, et al (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using gracilis and semitendinosus tendons. Comparison of through-the-condyle and over-the-top graft placement. Am J Sports Med 22:659–666

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lipscomb AB, Johnston RK, Snyder RB, et al (1982) Evaluation of hamstring strength following use of semitendinosus and glacilis tendons to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 10:340–342

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Maeda A, Shino K, Horibe S, et al (1996) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with multistranded autogenous semitendinosus tendon. Am J Sports Med 24:504–508

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakajima R, Maruyama Y, Ichiao K, et al (1996) Decreased hamstring strength after harvest of semitendinosus and gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Jpn Clin Sports Med Assoc 6:681–686

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nakamura N, Horibe S, Sasaki S, et al (2002) Evaluation of active knee flection and hamstring strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 18:598–602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohkoshi Y, Inoue C, Yamane S, et al (1998) Changes in muscle strength properties caused by harvesting of autogenous semitendinosus tendon for reconstruction of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 14:580–584

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Papandrea P, Vulpiani MC, Ferretti A, et al (2000) Regeneration of the semitendinosus tendon harvested for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Evaluation using ultrasonography. Am J Sports Med 28:556–561

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rispoli DM, Sanders TG, Miller MD, et al (2001) Magnetic resonance imaging at different time periods following hamstring harvest for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 17:2–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenberg TD, Brown GC, Deffner KT (1997) Anterior cruiciate legament reconstruction with a quadrupled semitendinosus autograft. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 5:51–58

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenberg TD, Deffner KT (1997) ACL reconstruction: semitendinosus tendon is the graft of choice. Orthopedics 20:396–398

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenberg TD, Graf B (1994) Techniques for ACL reconstruction with Multi-Trac drill guide. Acufex Microsurgucal, Mansfield MA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rowden NJ, Sher D, Rogers GJ, et al (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Initial comparison of patellar tendon and semitendinosus autografts in young fresh cadavers. Am J Sports Med 25:472–478

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sachs RA, Daniel DM, Stone ML, et al (1989) Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 17:760–765

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sakane M, Fox RJ, Woo SL-Y, et al (1997) In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads. J Orthop Res 15:285–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaieb MD, Kan DM, Chang SK, et al (2002) A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon sutografte for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30:214–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shino K, Nakata K, Horibe S, et al (1993) Quatitative evaluation after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: allograft and autograft. Am J Sports Med 21:609–616

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Simonian PT, Harrison SD, Cooley VJ, et al (1997) Assessment of morbidity of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg 10:54–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tashiro T, Kurosawa H, Kawakami A, et al (2003) Influence of medial hamstring tendon harvest on knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31:522–529

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Trotter JA (1993) Functional morphology of force transmission in skeletal muscle. A brief review. Acta Anat (Basel) 146:205–222

    Google Scholar 

  33. Viola RW, Sterett WI, Newfield D, et al (2000) Internal and external tibial rotation strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 28:552–555

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wickiewicz TL, Roy RR, Powell PL, et al (1983) Muscle architecture of the human lower limb. Clin Orthop 179:275–283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Winters JM, Woo SL (1990) Multiple muscle systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 732–736

    Google Scholar 

  36. Woo SL-Y, Orlando CO, Camp JF, et al (1986) Effects of postmortem storage by freezing on ligament tensile behavior. J Biomech 19:399–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Ohkoshi Y, et al (1995) Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 23:706–714

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Science, University of Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan

    Yukiko Makihara & Akie Nishino

  2. Faculty of Sports Science, University of Waseda, Tokorozawa, Saitama 359-1192, Japan

    Toru Fukubayashi

  3. Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Science, Ami-cho, Inashik, Ibaraki, Japan

    Akihiro Kanamori

Authors
  1. Yukiko Makihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akie Nishino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Toru Fukubayashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akihiro Kanamori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toru Fukubayashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Makihara, Y., Nishino, A., Fukubayashi, T. et al. Decrease of knee flexion torque in patients with ACL reconstruction: combined analysis of the architecture and function of the knee flexor muscles. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14, 310–317 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-005-0701-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-005-0701-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation