Skip to main content
Log in

Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

ACL-reconstruction aims to restore joint stability and prevent osteoarthritis; however, malfunction and osteoarthritis are often the sequelae. Our study asks whether ACL-reconstruction or conservative treatment lead to better long-term results. In this retrospective cohort study, 136 patients with isolated ACL-rupture who had been treated by bone-ligament-bone transplant or conservatively were identified. Twenty-seven of these were excluded because of a revision operation in the 11.1 years follow-up period, leaving 109 patients (60 reconstructions and 49 conservatively treated) for evaluation based on clinical, radiological and internationally accepted knee-scores (Tegner, IKDC, Kellgren and Lawrence). An individual cohort study is classified as EBM level 2b according to the Oxford Centre of EBM. We observed significantly better knee-stability (P = 0.008) but more osteoarthritis (Grade II or higher) after ACL-reconstruction (42% vs. 25%). Physical activity levels were similar in both groups during the follow-up period (P = 0.16). Eleven years after ACL-rupture the physical activity levels are similar for both groups. After ACL-reconstruction, stability is higher as is osteoarthritis, whereby the result is not necessarily perceived as better subjectively. Specifically, this retrospective study yielded a 24% incidence of oseoarthrits 11 years after conservative management of ACL-rupture in patients not needing secondary surgery. The risk of secondary meniscal tears is reduced after ACL reconstruction, which reduces the negative effects of OA after surgery. The ultimate objective would be to achieve a good subjective outcome by conservative treatment followed by a rehabilitation program designed to keep secondary meniscus tears at a low level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn JH, Yoo JC, Yang HS, Kim JH, Wang JH (2007) Second-look arthroscopic findings of 208 patients after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(3):242–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ait Si Selmi T, Fithian D, Neyret P (2006) The evolution of osteoarthritis in 103 patients with ACL reconstruction at 17 years follow-up. Knee 13:353–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson C, Odensten M, Gillquist J (1991) Knee function after surgical or nonsurgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament: a randomized study with a long-term follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res:255–263

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andersson C, Odensten M, Good L, Gillquist J (1989) Surgical or non-surgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. A randomized study with long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:965–974

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Behrend H, Stutz G, Kessler MA, Rukavina A, Giesinger K, Kuster MS (2006) Tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: quality control in a teaching hospital. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(11):1159–1165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beynnon BD, Ryder SH, Konradsen L, Johnson RJ, Johnson K, Renstrom PA (1999) The effect of anterior cruciate ligament trauma and bracing on knee proprioception. Am J Sports Med 27:150–155

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brophy RH, Selby RM, Altchek DW (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament revision: double-bundle augmentation of primary vertical graft. Arthroscopy 22:683 e681–e685

    Google Scholar 

  8. Casteleyn PP, Handelberg F (1996) Non-operative management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the general population. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:446–451

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen M, Amaro JT, Ejnisman B, Carvalho RT, Nakano KK, Peccin MS, Teixeira R, Laurino CF, Abdalla RJ (2007) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after 10 to 15 years: association between meniscectomy and osteoarthrosis. Arthroscopy 23:629–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cunningham R, West JR, Greis PE, Burks RT (2002) A survey of the tension applied to a doubled hamstring tendon graft for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 18:983–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE, Fithian DC, Rossman DJ, Kaufman KR (1994) Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 22:632–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Feagin JA Jr, Curl WW (1976) Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: 5-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 4:95–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fink C, Hoser C, Benedetto KP, Hackl W, Gabl M (1996) Long-term outcome of conservative or surgical therapy of anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Unfallchirurg 99:964–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Finsterbush A, Frankl U, Matan Y, Mann G (1990) Secondary damage to the knee after isolated injury of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 18:475–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML, Luetzow WF, Csintalan RP, Phelan D, Daniel DM (2005) Prospective trial of a treatment algorithm for the management of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Am J Sports Med 33:335–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hawkins RJ, Misamore GW, Merritt TR (1986) Followup of the acute nonoperated isolated anterior cruciate ligament tear. Am J Sports Med 14:205–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hertel P, Behrend H, Cierpinski T, Musahl V, Widjaja G (2005) ACL reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone press-fit fixation: 10-year clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:248–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Indelicato PA, Bittar ES (1985) A perspective of lesions associated with ACL insufficiency of the knee. A review of 100 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res (198):77–80

  19. Irrgang JJ, Ho H, Harner CD, Fu FH (1998) Use of the international knee documentation committee guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:107–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jakob RP (1990) Indikation zur Kreuzbandplastik: rekapitulation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kostogiannis I, Ageberg E, Neuman P, Dahlberg L, Friden T, Roos H (2007) Activity level and subjective knee function 15 years after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective, longitudinal study of nonreconstructed patients. Am J Sports Med 35:1135–1143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuster MS, Grob K, Kuster M, Wood GA, Gachter A (1999) The benefits of wearing a compression sleeve after ACL reconstruction. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:368–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Linko E, Harilainen A, Malmivaara A, Seitsalo S (2005) Surgical versus conservative interventions for anterior cruciate ligament ruptures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD001356

  25. Maletius W, Messner K (1999) Eighteen- to twenty-four-year follow-up after complete rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 27:711–717

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McDaniel WJ Jr, Dameron TB Jr (1983) The untreated anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Clin Orthop Relat Res (172):158–163

  27. McDaniel WJ Jr, Dameron TB Jr (1980) Untreated ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. A follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:696–705

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Meunier A, Odensten M, Good L (2007) Long-term results after primary repair or non-surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a randomized study with a 15-year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:230–237

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Muellner T, Alacamlioglu Y, Nikolic A, Schabus R (1998) No benefit of bracing on the early outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:88–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nebelung W, Wuschech H (2005) Thirty-five years of follow-up of anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees in high-level athletes. Arthroscopy 21:696–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Neyret P, Donell ST, Dejour H (1993) Results of partial meniscectomy related to the state of the anterior cruciate ligament. Review at 20 to 35 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75:36–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pinczewski LA, Lyman J, Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Roe J, Linklater J (2007) A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med 35:564–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Scopp JM, Jasper LE, Belkoff SM, Moorman CT III (2004) The effect of oblique femoral tunnel placement on rotational constraint of the knee reconstructed using patellar tendon autografts. Arthroscopy 20:294–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sommerlath K, Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1991) The long-term course after treatment of acute anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A 9 to 16 year followup. Am J Sports Med 19:156–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Stergiou N, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, Georgoulis AD (2007) Tibial Rotation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL)-Deficient and ACL-Reconstructed Knees: a theoretical proposition for the development of osteoarthritis. Sports Med 37:601–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stevenson WW III, Johnson DL (2007) Vertical grafts—a common reason for functional failure after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedics 30:206–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Strehl A, Eggli S (2007) The value of conservative treatment in ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). J Trauma 62:1159–1162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res (198):43–49

  39. Vasara AI, Jurvelin JS, Peterson L, Kiviranta I (2005) Arthroscopic cartilage indentation and cartilage lesions of anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. Am J Sports Med 33:408–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zysk SP, Refior HJ (2000) Operative or conservative treatment of the acutely torn anterior cruciate ligament in middle-aged patients. A follow-up study of 133 patients between the ages of 40 and 59 years. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:59–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. Kessler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kessler, M.A., Behrend, H., Henz, S. et al. Function, osteoarthritis and activity after ACL-rupture: 11 years follow-up results of conservative versus reconstructive treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 442–448 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0498-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0498-x

Keywords

Navigation