Abstract
Purpose
To compare objective measures of in vivo joint laxity between patients treated with single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions.
Methods
Sixty-four patients matched by age, height, weight, and that had undergone unilateral SB or DB hamstring ACL reconstruction participated in this study. Bilateral anterior tibial translation (ATT) was recorded using the KT1000 arthrometer, and a robotic testing system was used to assess side-to-side differences in rotational characteristics. Each reconstruction was evaluated to determine how well it mimicked the anteroposterior (AP) and rotational biomechanics of the normal knee. A reconstruction was defined as mimicking the normal knee if ATT and internal rotation (IR) were within 3 mm and 3.5°, respectively.
Results
Side-to-side differences in ATT were significantly higher for the SB group (2.2 ± 1.4 mm) than the DB group (1.1 ± 1.0 mm, P = 0.001). While relative side-to-side differences in IR did not differ between the SB (1.3°) and DB groups (1.1°, P = 0.82), absolute IR differences were significantly less with the DB reconstruction (2.1° vs. 4.7°, P = 0.001). A significantly greater percentage of DB patients (81%, P = 0.0003) had both ATT and IR similar to the normal knee, compared to 34% of the SB patients; however, IKDC subjective scores did not differ between groups. Regardless of technique, patients with the greatest rotational laxity of their non-operative knee demonstrated significantly worse IKDC scores.
Conclusion
DB reconstruction resulted in reduced side-to-side differences in both ATT and IR. The DB technique more consistently reproduced the biomechanical profile of the uninjured limb than did the SB technique without increasing the risk of over-constraining the knee.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abebe E, Mooreman CI, Dziedzic T, Spritzer C, Cothran R, Taylor D, Garrett WJ, DeFrate L (2009) Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques. Am J Sports Med 37:1904–1911
Anderson A, Snyder R, Lipscomb AS (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons augmented by the losee iliotibial band tenodesis. A long-term study. Am J Sports Med 22:620–626
Branch T, Browne J, Campbell J, Siebold R, Freedberg H, Arendt E, Lavoie F, Neyret P, Jacobs C (2009) Rotational laxity greater in patients with contralateral anterior cruciate ligament injury than healthy volunteers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-1010-y. Available electronically December 18, 2009
Branch T, Mayr H, Browne J, Campbell J, Stoehr A, Jacobs C (2010) Instrumented examination of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: minimizing flaws of the manual clinical examination. Arthroscopy 26:997–1004
Buss D, Warren R, Wickiewicz T, Galinat B, Panariello R (1993) Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of autogenous patellar-ligament grafts. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 75-A:1346–1355
Colombet P, Robinson J, Jambou S, Allard M, Bousquet V, de Lavigne C (2006) Two-bundle, four-tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:629–636
Cook A, Koh J, Ren Y, Zhang L (2009) Anatomic single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis of stability. Proc AAOSM 2009 Specialty Day:36
Daniel D, Malcom L, Losse G, Stone M, Sachs R, Burks R (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:720–726
Daniel D, Stone M, Dobson B (1994) Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 22:632–644
Dayal N, Chang A, Dunlop D, Hayes K, Chang R, Cahue S, Song J, Torres L, Sharma L (2008) The natural history of anteroposterior laxity and its role in knee osteoarthritis progression. Arthritis Rheum 52:2343–2349
DeFrate L, Papannagari R, Gill T, Moses J, Pathare N, Li G (2006) The 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament deficiency: an in vivo imaging analysis. Am J Sports Med 34:1240–1246
Feller J, Webster K (2003) A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31:564–573
Ferretti A, Monaco E, Labianca L, Conteduca F, De Carli A (2008) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery study. Am J Sports Med 36:760–766
Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Miyama T, Shiozaki Y, Mae T (2001) Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with EndoButton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 17:801–807
Hofbauer M, Valentin P, Kdolsky R, Ostermann R, Graf A, Figl M, Aldrian S (2009) Rotational and translational laxity after computer-navigated single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0992-9. Available electronically November 28, 2009
Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y, Tsukada H, Toh S (2009) Navigation evaluation of the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the posterolateral bundle more important? Arthroscopy 25:488–495
Jacobs C, Christensen C (2009) Correlations between Knee Society Function Scores and functional force measures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2414–2419
Jarvela T (2007) Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:500–507
Jarvela T, Moisala A-S, Sihvonen R, Jarvela S, Kannus P, Jarvinen M (2008) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med 36:290–297
Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthritis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75:594–599
Kim S-J, Chang J-H, Kim T-W, Jo S-B, Oh K-S (2009) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of a single or double-bundle technique in patients with generalized ligamentous laxity. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 91-A:257–262
Kocher M, Steadman J, Briggs K, Sterett W, Hawkins R (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:629–634
Lane C, Warren R, Pearle A (2008) The pivot shift. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:679–688
Leitze Z, Losee R, Jokl P, Johnson T, Feagin J (2005) Implications of the pivot shift in the ACL-deficient knee. Clin Orthop Related Res 436:229–236
Markolf K, Park S, Jackson S, McAllister D (2008) Simulated pivot-shift testing with single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 90-A:1681–1689
Markolf K, Park S, Jackson S, McAllister D (2009) Anterior-posterior and rotatory stability of single and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 91-A:107–118
Meredick R, Vance K, Appleby D, Lubowitz J (2008) Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 36:1414–1421
Mizner R, Snyder-Mackler L (2005) Altered loading during walking and sit-to-stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 23:1083–1090
Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T, Ju Y-J, Hara K, Nimura A, Yagishita K, Sekiya I (2007) A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 23:618–628
Noyes F, Grood E, Butler D, Malek M (1980) Clinical laxity tests and functional stability of the knee: biomechanical concepts. Clin Orthop Related Res 146:84–89
O’Neill D (1996) Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective randomized analysis of three techniques. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 78-A:803–813
Outerbridge R (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 43-B:752–757
Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Tsepis E, Moraiti C, Georgoulis A (2006) Follow-up evaluation 2 years after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft shows that excessive tibial rotation persists. Clin J Sport Med 16:111–116
Sajovic M, Vengust V, Komadina R, Tavcar R, Skaza K (2006) A prospective, randomized comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: five-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34:1933–1940
Schmitt L, Rudolph K (2007) Influences on knee movement strategies during walking in persons with medial knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 57:1018–1026
Seon J, Gadikota H, Wu J-L, Sutton K, Gill T, Li G (2010) Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in restoration of knee kinematics and anterior cruciate ligament forces. Am J Sports Med 38:1559–1567
Sharma L, Cahue S, Song J, Hayes K, Pai Y-C, Dunlop D (2003) Physical functioning over three years in knee osteoarthritis: role of psychosocial, local mechanical, and neuromuscular factors. Arthritis Rheum 48:3359–3370
Sharma L, Eckstein F, Song J, Guermazi A, Prasad P, Kapoor D, Cahue S, Marshall M, Hudelmaier M, Dunlop D (2008) Relationship of meniscal damage, meniscal extrusion, malalignment, and joint laxity to subsequent cartilage loss in osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 58:1716–1726
Sharma L, Hayes K, Felson D, Buchanan T, Kirwan-Mellis G, Lou C, Pai Y-C, Dunlop D (1999) Does laxity alter the relationship between strength and physical function in knee osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 42:25–32
Sharma L, Lou C, Felson D, Dunlop D, Kirwan-Mellis G, Hayes K, Weinrach D, Buchanan T (1999) Laxity in healthy and osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum 42:861–870
Shelbourne K, Urch S (2000) Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the contralateral autogenous patellar tendon. Am J Sports Med 28:651–658
Shelbourne K, Vanadurongwan B, Gray T (2007) Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using contralateral patellar tendon autograft. Clin Sports Med 26:549–565
Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T (2008) Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:137–145
Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J (2008) Tibial insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry, arthroscopic landmarks, and orientation model for bone tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 24:154–161
Stergiou N, Ristanis S, Moraiti C, Georgoulis A (2007) Tibial rotation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees. A theoretical proposition for the development of osteoarthritis. Sports Med 37:601–613
Stratford P, Kennedy D (2006) Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. J Clin Epidemiol 59:160–167
van der Esch M, Steultjens M, Knol D, Dinant H, Dekker J (2006) Joint laxity and the relationship between muscle strength and functional ability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 55:953–959
van der Hart C, van den Bekerom M, Patt T (2008) The occurrence of osteoarthritis at a minimum of ten years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Surg Res 3:24. doi:10.1186/1749-799X-3-24. Available electronically June 10, 2008
Wada M, Imura S, Baba H, Shimada S (1996) Knee laxity in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 35:560–563
Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2006) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Related Res 454:100–107
Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251
Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Martelli S, Imakiire N, Lopomo N, Marcacci M (2006) New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:811–816
Zantop T, Petersen W, Sekiya J, Musahl V, Fu F (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament anatomy and function relating to anatomical reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:982–992
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Branch, T.P., Siebold, R., Freedberg, H.I. et al. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction demonstrated superior clinical stability to single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a matched-pairs analysis of instrumented tests of tibial anterior translation and internal rotation laxity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 432–440 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1247-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1247-5