Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of additional gracilis tendon harvest on muscle torque, motor coordination, and knee laxity in ACL reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate muscle torque, lower extremity coordination, and knee laxity after ACL reconstruction comparing patients operated on with semitendinosus graft (ST) and patients with combined semitendinosus and gracilis (STGR) grafts.

Methods

Forty-six subjects who underwent ST (n = 23) or STGR harvest (n = 23) ACL reconstruction participated in this study. Quadriceps and hamstring torque were recorded using an isokinetic dynamometer. The anterior tibial translation was measured using the Kneelax 3 Arthrometer. The eccentric and concentric motor coordination was tested by multi-joint lower-limb tracking-trajectory test. All measurements were taken 12 months after surgery. Side-to-side differences were determined for all subjects.

Results

Side-to-side differences in extensor peak torque at 180°/s and 60°/s did not differ between semitendinosus (ST) and semitendinosus + gracilis (STGR) groups (n.s.). However, side-to-side differences in flexor peak torque were significantly higher at 60°/s for the STGR group than the ST group (P = 0.002). Side-to-side differences in eccentric and concentric parts of tracking-trajectory test and anterior tibial translation did not differ between the STGR and the ST groups (n.s.).

Conclusion

The outcomes of this study suggested that additional harvest of gracilis did not influence lower extremity motor control, quadriceps muscle torque, and anterior tibial translation; however, it affected knee flexion isokinetic torque negatively at low angular velocity. This finding could be important for functional activity or sports with high demands on hamstring muscle strength. It is recommended that gracilis muscle should be preserved as possible during ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence

Prospective comparative study, Level II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ageberg E, Fride′n T (2008) Normalized motor function but impaired sensory function after unilateral non-reconstructed ACL injury: patients compared with uninjured controls. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:449–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anders JO, Venbrocks RA, Weinberg M (2008) Proprioceptive skills and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a bone-tendon-bone graft. Int Orthop 32:627–633

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aune A, Holm I, Risberg MA, Jensen HK, Steen H (2001) Four-strand hamstring tendon autograft compared with patellar tendon-bone autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 29:722–728

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bizzini M, Gorelick M, Munzinger U, Drobny T (2006) Joint laxity and isokinetic thigh muscle strength characteristics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone patellar tendon bone versus quadrupled hamstring autografts. Clin J Sport Med 16:4–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Branch TP, Siebold R, Freedberg HI, Jacobs CA (2010) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction demonstrated superior clinical stability to single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a matched-pairs analysis of instrumented tests of tibial anterior translation and internal rotation laxity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-010-1247-5

  6. Croce RV, Miller JP (2006) Angle- and velocity-specific alterations in torque and semg activity of the quadriceps and hamstrings during isokinetic extension-flexion movements. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 46:83–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel DM, Stone ML, Sachs R, Malcom L (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am J Sports Med 13:401–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Eriksson K, Anderberg P, Hamberg P, Olerud P, Wredmark T (2001) There are differences in early morbidity after ACL reconstruction when comparing patellar tendon and semitendinosus tendon graft. A prospective randomized study of 107 patients. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:170–177

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Feller JA, Webster KE (2003) A randomized comparison of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31:564–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freedman K, D’Amato M, Nedeff D, Kaz Ari, Bach B (2003) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 31:2–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadjicostas PT, Soucacos PN, Koleganova N, Krohmer G, Berger I (2008) Comparative and morphological analysis of commonly used autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the native ACL: an electron, microscopic and morphologic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1099–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Johansson H, Sjölander P, Sojka P (1991) A sensory role for the cruciate ligaments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 268:161–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johansson H, Sjölander P, Sojka P (1991) Receptors in the knee joint ligaments and their role in the biomechanics of the joint. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18:341–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Macchi V, Vigato E, Porzionato A, Tiengo C, Stecco C, Parenti A, Morra A, Bassetto F, Mazzoleni F, De Caro R (2008) The gracilis muscle and its use in clinical reconstruction: an anatomical, embryological, and radiological study. Clin Anat 21:696–704

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Maffiuletti NA, Bizzini M, Schatt S, Munzinger U (2005) A multi-joint lower-limb tracking-trajectory test for the assessment of motor coordination. Neurosci Lett 384:106–111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Makihara Y, Nishino A, Fukubayashi T, Kanamori A (2006) Decrease of knee flexion torque in patients with ACL reconstruction: combined analysis of the architecture and function of the knee flexor muscles. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:310–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Iacono F, Vascellari A, Loreti I, Kon E, Presti ML (2003) Intra- and extra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction utilizing autogeneous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons: 5-year clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:2–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Melnyk M, Faist M, Gothner M, Claes L, Friemert B (2007) Changes in stretch reflex excitability are related to “giving way” symptoms in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture. J Neurophysiol 97:474–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Meystre JL, Vallotton J, Benvenuti JF (1998) Double semitendinosus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 10-year results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:76–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Prodromos CC, Han YS, Keller BL, Bolyard RJ (2005) Stability results of hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2- to 8-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 21:138–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Siebel T, Geiger F, Poehlmann D, Heisel J (1995) Experimental study of the stability of the knee after total knee replacement with a low contact stress prosthesis. Knee 2:33–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Solomonow M, Krogsgaard M (2001) Sensorimotor control of knee stability. A review. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:64–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vairo GL, Myers JB, Sell TC, Fu FH, Harner CD, Lephart SM (2008) Neuromuscular and biomechanical landing performance subsequent to ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:2–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Viola RW, Sterett WI, Newfield D, Steadman JR, Torry MR (2000) Internal and external tibial rotation strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using ipsilateral semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 28:552–555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yasuda K, Tsujino J, Ohkoshi Y (1995) Graft site morbidity with autogenous semitendinosus and gracilis tendons. Am J Sports Med 23:706–714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank University and State Planning Organization of the Prime Ministry for providing equipment for this study The authors also thank Tracy Spigelman PhD, ATC, for valuable contribution to this study.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest with respect to the data collected and procedures used within this study.

Ethical statement

The authors confirm this study meets the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and after local ethical approval all subjects provided written informed consent. Ethical approval for the study was received from University and State Planning Organization of the Prime Ministry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hayri Baran Yosmaoglu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yosmaoglu, H.B., Baltaci, G., Ozer, H. et al. Effects of additional gracilis tendon harvest on muscle torque, motor coordination, and knee laxity in ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 1287–1292 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1412-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1412-5

Keywords

Navigation