Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasound-guided injection for MR arthrography of the hip: comparison of two different techniques

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the two different ultrasound-guided injection techniques for MR arthrography of the hip.

Materials and methods

Fifty-nine consecutive patients (21 men, 38 women) referred for MR arthrographies of the hip were prospectively included in the study. Three patients underwent bilateral MR arthrography. The two injection techniques were quantitatively and qualitatively compared. Quantitative analysis was performed by the comparison of injected contrast material volume into the hip joint. Qualitative analysis was performed with regard to extraarticular leakage of contrast material into the soft tissues. Extraarticular leakage of contrast material was graded as none, minimal, moderate, or severe according to the MR images. Each patient rated discomfort after the procedure using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results

The injected contrast material volume was less in femoral head puncture technique (mean 8.9 ± 3.4 ml) when compared to femoral neck puncture technique (mean 11.2 ± 2.9 ml) (p < 0.05). The chi-squared test showed significantly more contrast leakage by femoral head puncture technique (p < 0.05). Statistical analysis showed no difference between the head and neck puncture groups in terms of feeling of pain (p = 0.744) or in the body mass index (p = 0.658) of the patients.

Conclusion

The femoral neck injection technique provides high intraarticular contrast volume and produces less extraarticular contrast leakage than the femoral head injection technique when US guidance is used for MR arthrography of the hip.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blankenbaker DG, Tuite MJ. The painful hip: new concepts. Skeletal Radiol. 2006;35:352–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Petersilge CA, Haque MA, Petersilge WJ, Lewin JS, Lieberman JM, Buly R. Acetabular labral tears: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology. 1996;200:231–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hodler J, Yu JS, Goodwin D, Haghighi P, Trudell D, Resnick D. MR arthrography of the hip: improved imaging of the acetabular labrum with histologic correlation in cadavers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:887–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Razzano CD, Nelson CL, Wilde AH. Arthrography of the adult hip. Clin Orthop. 1974;99:86–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leopold SA, Battista V, Oliverio JA. Safety and efficacy of intraarticular hip injection using anatomic landmarks. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;391:192–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sofka CM, Saboeiro G, Adler RS. Ultrasound-guided adult hip injections. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;16:1121–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kilcoyne RF, Kaplan P. The lateral approach for hip arthrography. Skeletal Radiol. 1992;21:239–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aliabadi P, Baker ND, Jaramillo D. Hip arthrography, aspiration, block, and bursography. Radiol Clin North Am. 1998;36:673–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Caglar-Yagci H, Unsal S, Yagci I, Dulgeroglu D, Ozel S. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound guided intra-articular hylan G-F 20 injection in osteoarthritis of the hip: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int. 2005;25:341–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Qvistgaard E, Kristoffersen H, Terslev L, Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Torp-Pedersen S, Bliddal H. Guidance by ultrasound of intra-articular injections in the knee and hip joints. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2001;9:512–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Margules KR. Fluoroscopically directed steroid instillation in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis: safety and efficacy in 510 cases. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:2449–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Plant MJ, Borg AA, Dziedzic K, Saklatvala J, Dawes PT. Radiographic patterns and responses to corticoid hip injections. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997;56:476–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith J, Hurdle MF. Office based ultrasound-guided intraarticular hip injection: technique for physiatric practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:296–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith J, Hurdle MF, Weingarten TN. Accuracy of sonographically guided intra-articular injections in the native adult hip. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:329–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Duc SR, Hodler J, Schmid MR, et al. Prospective evaluation of two different injection techniques for MR arthrography of the hip. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:473–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Gebhard M, Wohlgemuth WA, et al. MR arthrography: pharmacology, efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Skeletal Radiol. 2003;32:1–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet. 1974;2:1127–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Binkert CA, Zanetti M, Hodler J. Patient’s assessment of discomfort during MR arthrography of the shoulder. Radiology. 2001;221:775–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatih Kantarci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kantarci, F., Ozbayrak, M., Gulsen, F. et al. Ultrasound-guided injection for MR arthrography of the hip: comparison of two different techniques. Skeletal Radiol 42, 37–42 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1306-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1306-0

Keywords

Navigation