Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) autografting fixed with metal interference screws (IS) is the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Advances in surgical technology provide a wide choice of grafts, fixation devices and surgical approaches.

Methods

Two-hundred and sixty-one orthopedic surgeons of ten subspecialties from 57 countries were surveyed on their choice of graft and fixation device, the number of reconstructed bundles, and arthroscopic portal. Their preferences were analyzed according to country of origin, field of expertise and seniority, and compared to current publications.

Results

Hamstring autografting was the most popular choice (63 %), then BPTB (26 %) and allograft (11 %). The anteromedial portal was preferred over the traditional transtibial portal (68 % versus 31 %). Two-thirds reported routinely performing a single-bundle graft reconstruction, compared to one-third who used the double-bundle technique. The Endo-button was the most common graft fixation method (40 %), followed by the bioabsorbable IS (34 %), metallic IS (12 %), rigidfix (10 %) and others (4 %). The preferences of hamstring tendon grafting and the anteromedial portal are not supported in the literature. Responses from North American and European surgeons were different from all the others.

Conclusions

Surgeon preferences in ACL reconstruction differ considerably worldwide. Common practice is not always supported by evidence-based publications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R (2010) The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligamentreconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(8):1013–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Araki D, Kuroda R, Kubo S, Fujita N, Tei K, Nishimoto K, Hoshino Y, Matsushita T, Matsumoto T, Nagamune K, Kurosaka M (2011) A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anteriorcruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Int Orthop 35(3):439–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baer GS, Harner CD (2007) Clinical outcomes of allograft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 26(4):661–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bedi A, Musahl V, Steuber V, Kendoff D, Choi D, Allen AA, Pearle AD, Altchek DW (2011) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction:an anatomic and biomechanicalevaluation of surgical technique. Arthroscopy 27(3):380–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Biau DJ, Katsahian S, Kartus J, Harilainen A, Feller JA, Sajovic M, Ejerhed L, Zaffagnini S, Röpke M, Nizard R (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2470–2478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowers AL, Bedi A, Lipman JD, Potter HG, Rodeo SA, Pearle AD, Warren RF, Altchek DW (2011) Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopy 27(11):1511–1522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang CB, Choi JY, Koh IJ, Lee KJ, Lee KH, Kim TK (2011) Comparisons of femoral tunnel position and length in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal techniques. Arthroscopy 27(10):1389–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen NC, Brand JC Jr, Jr Brown CH (2007) Biomechanics of intratunnel anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation. Clin Sports Med 26(4):695–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen SB, Sekiya JK (2007) Allograft safety in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 26:597–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Colvin A, Sharma C, Parides M, Glashow J (2011) What is the best femoral fixation of hamstring autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(4):1075–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delay BS, Smolinski RJ, Wind WM, Bowman DS (2001) Current practices and opinions in ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation: results of a survey of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Am J Knee Surg 14(2):85–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Duquin TR, Wind WM, Fineberg MS, Smolinski RJ, Buyea CM (2009) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 22(1):7–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elliott MJ, Kurtz CA (2007) Peripheral versus aperture fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 26(4):683–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Emond CE, Woelber EB, Kurd SK, Ciccotti MG, Cohen SB (2011) A comparison of the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable versus metal interference screws: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(6):572–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaweda K, Walawski J, Wegłowski R, Krzyzanowski W (2009) Comparison of bioabsorbable interference screws and posts for distal fixation in anteriorcruciate ligament reconstruction. Int Orthop 33(1):123–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL, Dahm DL (2008) A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24(3):292–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Spindler KP (2005) Evidence-based medicine for orthopedic surgeons. J Knee Surg 18(1):57–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawhorn KW, Howell SM (2007) Principles for using hamstring tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 26(4):567–585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lubowitz JH (2009) Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy 25(1):95–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reinhardt KR, Hetsroni I, Marx RG (2010) Graft selection for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a level I systematic review comparing failure rates and functional outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am 41(2):249–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Romanini E, D'Angelo F, De Masi S, Adriani E, Magaletti M, Lacorte E, Laricchiuta P, Sagliocca L, Morciano C, Mele A (2010) Graft selection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Traumatol 11(4):211–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sadoghi P, Müller PE, Jansson V, van Griensven M, Kröpfl A, Fischmeister MF (2011) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a clinical comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone single bundle versus semitendinosus and gracilis double bundle technique. Int Orthop 35(1):127–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schoderbek RJ Jr, Treme GP, Miller MD (2007) Bone-patella tendon-bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 26(4):525–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suk M, Hanson B, Helfet DL (2010) Evidence-based orthopedic surgery: is it possible? Orthop Clin North Am 41(2):139–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. van Eck CF, Schreiber VM, Mejia HA, Samuelsson K, van Dijk CN, Karlsson J, Fu FH (2010) "Anatomic" anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of surgical techniques and reporting of surgical data. Arthroscopy 26(9 Suppl):S2–S12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yasuda K, Tanabe Y, Kondo E, Kitamura N, Tohyama H (2010) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26(9 Suppl):S21–S34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Esther Eshkol is thanked for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Ofir Chechik, Eyal Amar, Morsi Khashan, Ran Lador & Aviram Gold

  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikvah, Israel

    Gil Eyal

Authors
  1. Ofir Chechik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eyal Amar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Morsi Khashan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ran Lador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gil Eyal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Aviram Gold
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ofir Chechik.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chechik, O., Amar, E., Khashan, M. et al. An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 201–206 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1611-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1611-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation