Abstract
Purpose
Open fibrin gluing is reported to enable anatomical reconstruction with less soft tissue compromise than suture repair. Our main objective was to compare the complication rate, function, pain and disability of the two operative approaches of percutaneous suture using the Paessler technique and open fibrin gluing.
Methods
Sixty-four patients (two centres, retrospective cohort study, 2000–2009) who had undergone acute Achilles tendon repair with either percutaneous suture (n = 27; 44 years) or open fibrin glue (n = 37; 45 years) took part in a follow-up examination after a median of 63 months (range, six to 180). Ankle range of motion, calf and ankle circumferences and return to work and sports activities were evaluated. Isokinetic und sonographic evaluation results were retrieved.
Results
Complications were noted in 22 patients (34 %). Delayed wound healing without evidence of surgical site infection was found in three patients in the fibrin group and two patients in the suture group. Postoperative scar tenderness described as pain at the rim of the shoe was significantly more frequent in the suture group (p = 0.03). Re-rupture requiring re-operation occurred in one patient. Transient paresthesia of the heel occurred in 12 patients. No sural nerve lesions were reported. There was no significant difference between groups regarding lower leg circumference, disability, or function. Ultrasound and isokinetic measurements did not reveal a significant difference between the two methods.
Conclusions
The present study suggests that open fibrin gluing is a reasonable alternative to percutaneous repair of acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon and both techniques can yield reliably good results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames PR, Longo UG, Denaro V, Maffulli N (2008) Achilles tendon problems: not just an orthopaedic issue. Disabil Rehabil 30(20–22):1646–1650
Metzl JA, Ahmad CS, Levine WN (2008) The ruptured Achilles tendon: operative and non-operative treatment options. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 1(2):161–164
Ufberg J, Harrigan RA, Cruz T, Perron AD (2004) Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: Achilles tendon rupture. Am J Emerg Med 22(7):596–600
Khan RJ, Carey Smith RL (2010) Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8(9):CD003674
Khan RJ, Fick D, Keogh A, Crawford J, Brammar T, Parker M (2005) Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2202–2210
Kocher MS, Bishop J, Marshall R, Briggs KK, Hawkins RJ (2002) Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: expected-value decision analysis. Am J Sports Med 30(6):783–790
Jiang N, Wang B, Chen A, Dong F, Yu B (2012) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis based on current evidence. Int Orthop 36(4):765–773
Hohendorff B, Siepen W, Spiering L, Staub L, Schmuck T, Boss A (2008) Long-term results after operatively treated Achilles tendon rupture: fibrin glue versus suture. J Foot Ankle Surg 47(5):392–399
Redaelli C, Niederhäuser U, Carrel T, Meier U, Trentz O (1992) Rupture of the Achilles tendon–fibrin gluing or suture? Chirurg 63(7):572–576
Buchgraber A, Pässler HH (1997) Percutaneous repair of Achilles tendon rupture. Immobilization versus functional postoperative treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 341:113–122
Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int 15(7):349–353
Thermann H, Zwipp H, Tscherne H (1995) Functional treatment concept of acute rupture of the Achilles tendon. 2 years results of a prospective randomized study. Unfallchirurg 98(1):21–32
Grechenig W, Clement H, Bratschitsch G, Fankhauser F, Peicha G (2002) Ultrasound diagnosis of the Achilles tendon. Orthopade 31(3):319–325
Möller M, Kälebo P, Tidebrant G, Movin T, Karlsson J (2002) The ultrasonographic appearance of the ruptured Achilles tendon during healing: a longitudinal evaluation of surgical and nonsurgical treatment, with comparisons to MRI appearance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(1):49–56
Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Aarabi S, Kaufman A, Glazebrook M (2012) Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(23):2136–2143
Willits K, Amendola A, Bryant D, Mohtadi NG, Giffin JR, Fowler P, Kean CO, Kirkley A (2010) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(17):2767–2775
Maes R, Copin G, Averous C (2006) Is percutaneous repair of the Achilles tendon a safe technique? A study of 124 cases. Acta Orthop Belg 72(2):179–183
Majewski M, Rohrbach M, Czaja S, Ochsner P (2006) Avoiding sural nerve injuries during percutaneous Achilles tendon repair. Am J Sports Med 34(5):793–798
Lenth RV (2007) Statistical power calculations. J Anim Sci 85(13 Suppl):E24–E29
Pajala A, Kangas J, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J (2002) Rerupture and deep infection following treatment of total Achilles tendon rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(11):2016–2021
Kołodziej L, Bohatyrewicz A, Kromuszczyńska J, Jezierski J, Biedroń M (2013) Efficacy and complications of open and minimally invasive surgery in acute Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective randomised clinical study–preliminary report. Int Orthop 37(4):625–629
Cetti R, Christensen SE, Ejsted R, Jensen NM, Jorgensen U (1993) Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 21(6):791–799
Nyyssönen T, Saarikoski H, Kaukonen JP, Lüthje P, Hakovirta H (2003) Simple end-to-end suture versus augmented repair in acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a retrospective comparison in 98 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 74(2):206–208
Bhattacharyya M, Gerber B (2009) Mini-invasive surgical repair of the Achilles tendon–does it reduce post-operative morbidity? Int Orthop 33(1):151–156
Gigante A, Moschini A, Verdenelli A, Del Torto M, Ulisse S, de Palma L (2008) Open versus percutaneous repair in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a randomized prospective study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(2):204–209
Henríquez H, Muñoz R, Carcuro G, Bastías C (2012) Is percutaneous repair better than open repair in acute Achilles tendon rupture? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(4):998–1003
McMahon SE, Smith TO, Hing CB (2011) A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing conventional to minimally invasive approaches for repair of an Achilles tendon rupture. Foot Ankle Surg 17(4):211–217
Lim J, Dalal R, Waseem M (2001) Percutaneous vs. open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon—a prospective randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Int 22(7):559–568
Haji A, Sahai A, Symes A, Vyas JK (2004) Percutaneous versus open tendo Achillis repair. Foot Ankle Int 25(4):215–218
Nilsson-Helander K, Thurin A, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI (2009) High incidence of deep venous thrombosis after Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(10):1234–1238
Schneppendahl J, Thelen S, Schek A, Bala I, Hakimi M, Grassmann JP, Eichler C, Windolf J, Wild M (2012) Initial stability of two different adhesives compared to suture repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture—a biomechanical evaluation. Int Orthop 36(3):627–632
Sadoghi P, Rosso C, Valderrabano V, Leithner A, Vavken P (2012) Initial Achilles tendon repair strength—synthesized biomechanical data from 196 cadaver repairs. Int Orthop 36(9):1947–1951
Maffulli N, Spiezia F, Longo UG, Denaro V (2012) Z-shortening of healed, elongated Achilles tendon rupture. Int Orthop 36(10):2087–2093
Kangas J, Pajala A, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J (2007) Achilles tendon elongation after rupture repair: a randomized comparison of 2 postoperative regimens. Am J Sports Med 35(1):59–64
Ambacher T, Kühn P, Schmidt R, Disselhorst-Klug C, Paar O (2001) Muscle strength and functional results after surgical repair of Achilles tendon rupture with fibrin gluing. Zentralbl Chir 126(12):989–994
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Source of funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Matthias Knobe and Gertraud Gradl contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Knobe, M., Gradl, G., Klos, K. et al. Is percutaneous suturing superior to open fibrin gluing in acute Achilles tendon rupture?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 535–542 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2615-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2615-4