Abstract
Exercise-induced laryngeal obstructions (E-ILOs) are important differential diagnoses to exercise-induced asthma and are diagnosed by the continuous laryngoscopy exercise (CLE) test. There are two different methods for evaluating the severity of E-ILOs using recordings from the CLE test; the CLE score and EILOMEA. The aim of this study was to investigate the consistency between these methods. Using their respective method, the developers of each method evaluated 60 laryngoscopic recordings from patients with different subtypes and various levels of severity of E-ILOs. The CLE score evaluates glottic and supraglottic obstructions on a 4-grade scale. EILOMEA uses software to calculate the obstruction severity on continuous scales from a still frame of the larynx during maximal obstruction giving three parameters reflecting glottic and supraglottic obstruction. The means of the EILOMEA measures differed significantly for CLE score 1 vs. 2 and 2 vs. 3, but not for 0 vs. 1 for glottic as well as supraglottic obstructions. The EILOMEA method does not distinguish between CLE score 0 and 1, but otherwise the methods correlate. Since previous studies have suggested that only CLE scores of 2 and 3 reflect a severity of E-ILOs of clinical importance, this lack of the EILOMEA method is not crucial for a correct medical evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Røksund OD, Maat RC, Heimdal JH et al (2009) Exercise induced dyspnea in the young. Larynx as the bottleneck of the airways. Respir Med 103:1911–1918
Christensen PM, Thomsen SF, Rasmussen N et al (2011) Exercise-induced laryngeal obstructions: prevalence and symptoms in the general public. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:1313–1319
Morris MJ, Deal LE, Bean DR et al (1999) Vocal cord dysfunction in patients with exertional dyspnea. Chest 116:1676–1682
Weinberger M (2006) Exercise induced dyspnoea: if not asthma, then what? Arch Dis Child 91:543–544
Johansson H, Norlander K, Berglund L et al (2015) Prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction in a general adolescent population. Thorax 70:57–63
Naito A, Niimi S (2000) The larynx during exercise. Laryngoscope 110:1147–1150
Heimdal JH, Roksund OD, Halvorsen T et al (2006) Continuous laryngoscopy exercise test: a method for visualizing laryngeal dysfunction during exercise. Laryngoscope 116:52–57
Tervonen H, Niskanen MM, Sovijärvi AR et al (2009) Fiberoptic videolaryngoscopy during bicycle ergometry: a diagnostic tool for exercise-induced vocal cord dysfunction. Laryngoscope 119:1776–1780
Maat RC, Roksund OD, Halvorsen T et al (2009) Audiovisual assessment of exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction: reliability and validity of observations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1929–1936
Christensen P, Thomsen SF, Rasmussen N et al (2010) Exercise-induced laryngeal obstructions objectively assessed using EILOMEA. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267:401–407
Christensen P, Norlander K, Maat RC et al Inter-observer variations of two assessment methods for exercise-induced laryngeal obstructions. (Unpublished, co-submitted with this paper)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The study was funded by Uppsala County Research and Development Fund, University of Copenhagen and Team Denmark Research Fund. No author has any financial connections with the funding institutions or the outcome of the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norlander, K., Christensen, P.M., Maat, R.C. et al. Comparison between two assessment methods for exercise-induced laryngeal obstructions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273, 425–430 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3758-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-015-3758-7