Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Applicability of the skeletal age determination method of Tanner and Whitehouse for forensic age diagnostics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper analyses the applicability of the clinically prevalent skeletal age determination method of Tanner and Whitehouse for forensic age estimation in living individuals. For this purpose, the hand X-rays from 48 boys and 44 girls aged 12–16 years were evaluated retrospectively. The minima and maxima, the mean values with their standard deviations as well as the medians with upper and lower quartiles, are presented for the skeletal ages 12–16 years estimated by the TW2 and TW3 methods. In the legally relevant skeletal age group 14–16 years, the differences between the skeletal age and the mean value of the chronological age were between −0.1 and +1.4 years for the TW2 method. For the TW3 method, the differences between the skeletal age and the mean value of the chronological age were between −0.4 and +0.2 years in the relevant age group. Due to the risk of serious overestimations, the TW2 method seems to be unsuitable for forensic age diagnostics. The application of the TW3 method for forensic age estimations can be recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acheson RM (1954) A method of assessing skeletal maturity from radiographs: a report from the Oxford Child Health Survey. J Anat 88:498–508

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed ML, Warner JT (2007) TW2 and TW3 bone ages: time to change. Arch Dis Child 92:371–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen E (1971) Comparison of Tanner–Whitehouse and Greulich–Pyle methods in a large scale Danish survey. Am J Phys Anthropol 35:373–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beunen G, Lefevre J, Ostyn M, Renson R, Simons J, van Gernen D (1990) Skeletal maturity in Belgian youths assessed by the Tanner–Whitehouse method (TW2). Ann Hum Biol 17:355–376

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Braga J, Treil J (2007) Estimation of pediatric skeletal age using geometric morphometrics and three-dimensional cranial size changes. Int J Legal Med 121:439–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bull RK, Edwards PD, Kemp PM, Fry S, Hughes IA (1999) Bone age assessment: a large scale comparison of the Greulich and Pyle, and Tanner and Whitehouse (TW2) methods. Arch Dis Child 81:172–173

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cameriere R, De Angelis D, Ferrante L, Scarpino F, Cingolani M (2007) Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth: a European formula. Int J Legal Med 121:449–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cole AJL, Webb L, Cole TJ (1988) Bone age estimation: a comparison of methods. Br J Radiol 61:683–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cox LA (1996) Tanner–Whitehouse method of assessing skeletal maturity: problems and common errors. Horm Res 45(Suppl 2):53–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dünkel F, van Kalmthout A, Schüler-Springorum H (1997) Entwicklungstendenzen und Reformstrategien im Jugendstrafrecht im europäischen Vergleich. Forum, Mönchengladbach

  11. Fendel H (1976) Die Methodik der radiologischen Skeletalterbestimmung. Radiologe 16:370–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilli G (1996) The assessment of skeletal maturation. Horm Res 45 Suppl 2:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  13. Graham CB (1972) Assessment of bone maturation—methods and pitfalls. Radiol Clin N Amer 10:185–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Haavikko K, Kilpinen E (1973) Skeletal development of Finnish children in the light of hand–wrist roentgenograms. Proc Finn Dent Soc 69:182–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Helm S (1979) Skeletal maturity in Danish schoolchildren assessed by the TW2 method. Am J Phys Anthropol 51:345–352

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernandez M, Sanchez E, Sobradillo B, Rincon JM (1991) Skeletal maturation and height prediction: atlas and scoring methods. Diaz de Santos, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnston FE (1971) The use of the Greulich–Pyle method in a longitudinal growth study. Am J Phys Anthropol 35:353–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kemperdick HF (1981) Skelettalter-Bestimmung bei Kindern mit normalem und abweichendem Wachstumsverlauf. Fortschr Med 99:152–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kemperdick H (1986) Die Skelettalterbestimmung beim Kind. Radiologe 26:216–221

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. King DG, Steventon DM, O’Sullivan MP, Cook AM, Hornsby VP, Jefferson IG (1994) Reproducibility of bone ages when performed by radiology registrars: an audit of Tanner and Whitehouse II versus Greulich and Pyle methods. Br J Radiol 67:848–851

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van Lenthe FJ, Kemper HC, van Mechelen W (1998) Skeletal maturation in adolescence: a comparison between the Tanner–Whitehouse II and the Fels method. Eur J Pediatr 157:257–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Low WD (1975) Assessing skeletal maturity by inspection and bone-specific methods with the atlas of Greulich and Pyle. Z Morphol Anthropol 67:1–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Meijerman L, Maat GJR, Schulz R, Schmeling A (2007) Variables affecting the probability of complete fusion of the medial clavicular epiphysis. Int J Legal Med 121:463–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Olze A, van Niekerk P, Ishikawa T, Zhu BL, Schulz R, Maeda H, Schmeling A (2007) Comparative study on the effect of ethnicity on wisdom tooth eruption. Int J Legal Med 121:445–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rikhasor RM, Qureshi AM, Rathi SL, Channa NA (1999) Skeletal maturity in Pakistani children. J Anat 195:305–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Roche AF, Roberts J, Hamill PVV (1975) Skeletal maturity of children 6–11 years: racial, geographic area and socioeconomic differentials, United States. National Center for Health Statistics, series 11, no. 149. DHEW Publication no. (HRA) 76-1631. DHEW, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roche AF, Roberts J, Hamill PVV (1978) Skeletal maturity of youth 12–17 years. Racial, geographic area and socioeconomic differentials. (Vital and health statistics. US Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare. Series 11. No. 167). US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Thissen D (1988) Assessing the skeletal maturity of the hand–wrist: Fels method. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Loreck D, Vendura K, Markus W, Geserick G (2000) Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations. Int J Legal Med 113:253–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmeling A, Baumann U, Schmidt S, Wernecke K-D, Reisinger W (2006) Reference data for the Thiemann–Nitz method of assessing skeletal age for the purpose of forensic age estimation. Int J Legal Med 120:1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmeling A, Schulz R, Danner B, Rösing FW (2006) The impact of economic progress and modernization in medicine on the ossification of hand and wrist. Int J Legal Med 120:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Schmid F (1974) Skelettentwicklung bei hirnorganischen Störungen. Kinderarzt 5:1045–1047

    Google Scholar 

  34. Schmidt S, Koch B, Mühler M, Reisinger W, Schmeling A (2007) Optimizing the Thiemann–Nitz method for skeletal age determination for forensic age diagnostics in live subjects. Scand J Forensic Sci 13:5–7

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schmidt S, Koch B, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Schmeling A (2007) Comparative analysis of the applicability of the skeletal age determination methods of Greulich–Pyle and Thiemann–Nitz for forensic age estimation in living subjects. Int J Legal Med 121:293–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schmidt S, Mühler M, Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Schulz R (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of the clavicular ossification. Int J Legal Med 121:321–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Schmidt S, Baumann U, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Schmeling A (2008) Study of age dependence of epiphyseal ossification of the hand skeleton. Int J Legal Med 122:51–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schmidt S, Koch B, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Schmeling A (2008) Studies in use of the Greulich–Pyle skeletal age method to assess criminal liability. Int J Legal Med DOI 10.1016/j.legalmed.2008.01.003

  39. Schulz R, Mühler M, Reisinger W, Schmidt S, Schmeling A (2008) Radiographic staging of ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysis. Int J Legal Med 122:55–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schulz R, Zwiesigk P, Schiborr M, Schmidt S, Schmeling A (2008) Ultrasound studies on the time course of clavicular ossification. Int J Legal Med 122:163–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Healy MJR (1962) A new system for estimating skeletal maturity from the hand and wrist with standards derived from a study of 2600 healthy British children. Part II. The scoring system. Int Child Centre, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H (1975) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 method). Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H (1983) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 method), 2nd edn. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tanner JM, Oshman D, Bahhage F, Healy M (1997) Tanner–Whithouse bone age reference values for North American children. J Pediatr 131:34–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Tanner JM, Healy MJR, Goldstein H, Cameron N (2001) Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW3 method). Saunders, London

    Google Scholar 

  46. Thiemann H-H, Nitz I (1991) Röntgenatlas der normalen Hand im Kindesalter. Thieme, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  47. Thiemann H-H, Nitz I, Schmeling A (2006) Röntgenatlas der normalen Hand im Kindesalter. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  48. Vignolo M, Milani S, Cerbello G, Coroli P, Di Battista E, Aicardi G (1992) FELS, Greulich–Pyle, and Tanner–Whitehouse bone age assessments in a group of Italian children and adolescents. Am J Hum Biol 4:493–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Weber R (1978) Genauigkeit der Skelettalterbestimmungen und Größenprognosen nach den Methoden von Greulich and Pyle sowie Tanner and Whitehouse, Dissertation. Freie Universität, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Karl Minas for kindly permitting the use of the hand radiographs assessed here.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Rechtsmedizin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Turmstraße 21, 10559, Berlin, Germany

    Sven Schmidt

  2. Institut für Rechtsmedizin, Röntgenstraße 23, 48149, Münster, Germany

    Ronald Schulz & Andreas Schmeling

  3. Friesenstraße 4, 12524, Berlin, Germany

    Inna Nitz

Authors
  1. Sven Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Inna Nitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ronald Schulz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andreas Schmeling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Schmeling.

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. G. Geserick on the occasion of his 70th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, S., Nitz, I., Schulz, R. et al. Applicability of the skeletal age determination method of Tanner and Whitehouse for forensic age diagnostics. Int J Legal Med 122, 309–314 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0237-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0237-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation