Abstract
Background
Understanding the contextual preferences that people have for engaging in a health-enhancing physical activity has been identified as particularly important, as these preferences have been implicated in the maintenance of active lifestyle behaviors.
Purpose
The primary purpose of this study was to examine adults’ preferences for exercising in both gender-segregated and gender-integrated physical activity groups. The secondary purpose was to examine whether overweight status moderates adults’ preferences for gender-segregated groups relative to gender-integrated groups.
Method
Survey data were obtained from a representative sample of 772 adults (N males = 407; N females = 365) in a large city in the United Kingdom.
Results
Males and females reported a stronger preference for exercising with members of their own gender relative to exercising in gender-integrated groups. In addition, overweight participants were found to report an accentuated relative preference for gender-segregated groups when compared to normal weight respondents.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that both within-group gender composition and overweight status should be considered as salient contextual factors when attempting to implement successful group-based exercise programs.
Notes
Data on adults’ preferences to exercise in different age-matched groups were presented in the paper by Beauchamp et al. [7]. None of the data on gender-integrated and gender-segregated preferences that are presented in this paper were included in the paper by Beauchamp et al.
References
Burke SM, Carron AV, Eys MA. Physical activity context: preferences of university students. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2006;7(1):1–13.
Thompson CE, Wankel LM. The effects of perceived activity choice upon frequency of exercise behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2006;10(5):436–43.
Daley AJ, Maynard IW. Preferred exercise mode and affective responses in physically active adults. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2003;4(4):347–56.
Dishman RK, Farquhar RP, Cureton KJ. Responses to preferred intensities of exertion in men differing in activity levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;26(6):783–90.
Parfitt G, Glendhill C. The effect of choice of exercise mode on psychological responses. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2004;5(2):111–7.
Beauchamp MR, Carron AV. Exercise preferences and environmental contexts: a response to King and Wilcox. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(3):370–2.
Beauchamp MR, Carron AV, McCutcheon S, Harper O. Older adults’ preferences for exercising alone versus in groups: considering contextual congruence. Ann Behav Med. 2007;33(2):200–6.
King AC, Wilcox S. Exploring physical activity preferences. Ann Behav Med. 2008;35(1):123–4.
Burke SM, Carron AV, Eys MA, Ntoumanis N, Estabrooks PA. Group versus individual approach? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity. Sport Exerc Psychol Rev. 2006;2(1):19–35.
Carron AV, Hausenblas HA, Mack DE. Social influence and exercise: a meta-analysis. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1996;18(1):1–16.
Dishman RK, Buckworth J. Increasing physical activity: a quantitative synthesis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996;28(6):706–19.
Turner JC. Social categorization and the self-concept: a social cognitive theory of group behavior. In: Lawler EJ, editor. Advances in group processes: theory and research, vol. 2. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1985. p. 72–121.
United Kingdom Office of National Statistics: United Kingdom Census. http://www.statistics.gov.uk (2001). Accessed 18 Sept 2010
World Health Organization. Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1995.
Pittinsky TL, Shih M, Ambady N. Identity adaptiveness: affect across multiple identities. J Soc Issues. 1999;55(3):503–18.
Kerksick C, Thomas A, Taylor L, et al. Effects of popular exercise and weight loss program on weight loss, body composition, energy expenditure and health in obese women. Nutr Metab Lond. 2009;6(23):1743–75.
Acknowledgements
This research project was supported by fellowships to the first author from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research [award number ST-JGS-01250-(07-1) POP] and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (award number 766-2008-0683), as well as a scholar award from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research to the second author [award number CI-SCH-01870(07-1)].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
William L. Dunlop and Mark R. Beauchamp contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dunlop, W.L., Beauchamp, M.R. En-Gendering Choice: Preferences for Exercising in Gender-Segregated and Gender-Integrated Groups and Consideration of Overweight Status. Int.J. Behav. Med. 18, 216–220 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-010-9125-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-010-9125-6